Search for: "Chambers v. United States of America" Results 381 - 400 of 499
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
Also in June last year, the United Nations Human Rights Council unanimously approved a parallel project “[r]equest[ing] the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to continue the work on domestic law remedies to address corporate involvement in gross human rights abuses, and to organize consultations with experts, States and other relevant stakeholders”. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court recognized the Boy Scouts of America’s First Amendment right to exclude gay men from membership—defining it as the right of “expressive association”—in the case Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 5:18 am by jonathanturley
… We now no longer know if the people who are spreading the rhetoric on Facebook or Twitter are actually in the United States of America. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Edith Roberts
He served as Missouri state director for Sen. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 7:03 am by Amy Howe
It emphasizes that Congress envisioned the FHA as having “unique and enormous breadth,” as evidenced by the fact that its stated purpose was to provide for “fair housing throughout the United States. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 7:18 pm by Legal Aggregate
Goldfarb, 430 U.S. 199 (1977)—both cases she argued—provided the basis for her opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am by INFORRM
United States A new version of KOSA – the Kids Online Safety Act – has been introduced in the Senate. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
Click Here United Parcel Service to Pay $53,931 Civil Penalty to Settle Alleged Violations of Waste Regulations at Lenexa, Kan. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 1:12 pm by Carl Esbeck
Chambers, the Town’s main brief states that the purpose of legislative prayer is “[t]o invoke Divine guidance on a public body entrusted with making the laws. [read post]
6 Oct 2024, 12:11 pm by John Floyd
Both Williams and Bell knew that Parsons wanted Williams in the death chamber. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm by Barbara McQuade
On Dec. 7, one week before the fake electoral votes were cast, District Judge Linda V. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm by John Elwood
United States, meaning that the court will be making yet another foray into the “categorical approach” to determining whether prior convictions are “crimes of violence” for sentencing purposes. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 7:23 am
Sponsored Topics: Sonia Sotomayor - Politics - Supreme Court of the United States - Jeff Sessions - Republican [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm by Jillian Moss
Chamber of Commerce, reportedly opposed the proposal, stating that the Council’s proposal would “slow down building the infrastructure of the future. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
” ENDNOTE [1] See Order, Lujan Claimants v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
(Patent Prospector) US-Korea adopt patent prosecution highway (Law360) (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property)    Global Global - General Obama, patent reform, patent litigation in the USA and Europe – IP Think Tank podcast 26 January 2009 (IP Think Tank) Intangible values collapse – the old 70% to 80% claim is now officially dead and buried (IAM) (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Managing value in a shrinking economy: the IP audit (IP Frontline) Downturn… [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]