Search for: "Childs v. Gross" Results 381 - 400 of 799
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2018, 9:31 am
Income Limits for Maintenance Calculations Beginning this year, if maintenance is found to be necessary, the court must now use the provided formula if the couple’s combined gross is equal to or less than $500,000 and neither spouse has previous obligations for spousal or child support. [read post]
1 May 2018, 9:31 am
Income Limits for Maintenance Calculations Beginning this year, if maintenance is found to be necessary, the court must now use the provided formula if the couple’s combined gross is equal to or less than $500,000 and neither spouse has previous obligations for spousal or child support. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Though it was agreed that the wife’s mother met the relationship, gross income, and not qualifying child requirements for being a qualified relative under section 151(d), the IRS took the position that the taxpayers did not provide more than one half of her support. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
  Relying on the Supreme Court’s 1975 decision in State v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 4:59 pm
Mental Anguish Damages Upheld in a Child-Care Case Adams v. [read post]
16 May 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
App. 1990) (a contractual waiver of liability will not protect a person guilty of gross negligence); Rogers v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:50 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
However, disagreements can arise even after an order is in place, which is what happened in Erickson v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Consider the December, 2017 decision of the Appellate Division, Third Department, in Rouis v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 10:00 pm by Elizabeth A. Bokermann, Esquire
The Pennsylvania Superior Court recently decided a non-precedential high-conflict custody case in J.W.I. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 3:23 am
No news on the Potomac, but the Court will hear oral argument today in Rivera v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:55 pm by familoo
In Maughan v Wilmot [2014] EWHC 1288 (Fam) (15 April 2014) the wife made an application for an extended CRO, which Mostyn J granted. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 1:34 pm by JB
Thus, the debate between Rivkin, Casey, and myself has overtones of the debate about the constitutionality of the modern state created by the New Deal, and indeed, Rivkin and Casey's constitutional argument relies on The Child Labor Tax Case, (Bailey v. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 11:20 am by Gregory Forman
It noted that “DSS cannot remove a child unless there is an unreasonable safety threat to the child, and that the standard practice is to keep children in the home when possible. [read post]