Search for: "Company Doe v. Public Citizen" Results 381 - 400 of 1,747
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2019, 3:05 am by Florence Campbell Jones
The EU notes that whistleblowers are important in uncovering unlawful activities that damage the public interest and the welfare of citizens and society. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
This case includes the following issues: (1) Does the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act [ICCTA] (49 U.S.C. [read post]
22 May 2012, 9:41 pm by Eugene Volokh
I believe that the public health, safety and welfare of our citizens does come into play here, and accordingly, I am going to deny Mr. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Indeed, respondents essentially concede that if an entity is a "public body" for purposes of the OML, it is a public "agency" for purposes of FOIL (see generally Perez, 5 NY3d at 528), although the converse is not necessarily true (see Citizens for Alternatives to Animal Labs, Inc. v Board of Trustees of State Univ. of New York, 92 NY2d 357, 362 [1998]). [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 5:00 am by Erik Gerding
Thus, a service provider who provides assistance to a company that makes a public misstatement cannot be held liable in a private securities-fraud action. [read post]
12 May 2014, 2:04 pm by Florian Mueller
Those companies have valuable software copyright holdings, but they also implemented other companies' Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) on various occasions. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 11:19 am by Edward T. Kang
This is because courts recognize that companies, “regardless of a state’s interest in the transaction of its citizens,” “have an interest in uniformity in dealings with their locations throughout the country,” as in Select Medical v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 1:52 pm by Clinton Fein
This article is a first person account and does not necessarily represent the views of EFF. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
This case includes the following issues: (1) Does the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act [ICCTA] (49 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 8:26 pm
" Nevertheless, in a post-Citizens United world, questions of the rights and responsibilities of companies as defined by U.S. courts have become the attention of much public debate and commentary. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:48 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Ferrari drove wildly while under the influence.The case is Ferrari v. [read post]