Search for: "Doe v. Baker" Results 381 - 400 of 1,836
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2011, 4:11 am by Rosalind English
Baker J refused the application, saying that the factor which carried substantial weight was the preservation of life. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 4:53 am by Garrett Hinck
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in Carpenter v. [read post]
One of the most contentious cases of the Supreme Court’s term has been Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:34 am by Amy Howe
Florida, in which the Court held that the Sixth Amendment does not require juries to have twelve members, and Apodaca v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Royal Dutch Shell decision hasn’t killed off Alien Tort cases, especially not in Ninth Circuit [Julian Ku/Opinio Juris on rejection of certiorari in Doe v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 11:13 am
"  Does that mean that since the contract was never rescinded, it's still valid? [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 5:57 am by William Ford
Robert Chesney dissected a factual dispute in Doe v. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 8:30 am by Dale Carpenter
[What the Supreme Court should do in 303 Creative v. [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 11:10 am by Anushka Limaye
Robert Chesney provided an in-depth analysis of the legal and policy lessons learned from Doe v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Kyleanne Hunter discussed the potential impacts that overturning Roe v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am by Blog Editorial
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors; Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors (Pretty Polly Limited); and Baker v… [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:39 pm
Finally, we will dispel a deep-rooted myth that contra non valentem does not apply to the domain of acquisitive prescription and reveal another strong convergence between Louisiana and France. [read post]