Search for: "Does v. Snyder" Results 381 - 400 of 575
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C. represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:54 am
As the Court of Appeals said in the Snyder case, the appointing authority must affirmatively act to effect a contingent permanent appointment [Snyder v Civil Service Commission, 72 NY2d, 981]. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am by John Elwood
Kentucky rulings where the trial court does not demonstrate on the record that it has evaluated “all of the circumstances that bear upon the issue of discrimination,” or whether, in light of Snyder v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 12:47 pm by Jason Shinn
Here’s a link to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals August 6, 2019, decision (Texas v EEOC). [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:40 am by Tiffany Blofield
   The program does not regulate the non-commercial component, namely use of the trademark. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 12:47 pm by Jason Shinn
Here’s a link to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals August 6, 2019, decision (Texas v EEOC). [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:17 pm by crush
I was surprised and pleased that Roberts himself wrote two important First Amendment decisions that you might have expected him to decide the other way: Snyder v. [read post]