Search for: "English v. English"
Results 381 - 400
of 9,873
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2017, 10:13 am
In Somerset v Stewart, 1772, English courts finally held that slavery was not recognised by English law, which led to the termination of slavery in England once and for all; and it was the influence of French courts’ decisions on the bestowal of freedom to foreign slaves that led to the reasoning of the English Court. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:51 am
In Somerset v Stewart, 1772, English courts finally held that slavery was not recognised by English law, which led to the termination of slavery in England once and for all; and it was the influence of French courts’ decisions on the bestowal of freedom to foreign slaves that led to the reasoning of the English Court. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:51 am
In Somerset v Stewart, 1772, English courts finally held that slavery was not recognised by English law, which led to the termination of slavery in England once and for all; and it was the influence of French courts’ decisions on the bestowal of freedom to foreign slaves that led to the reasoning of the English Court. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:33 pm
Stanford University v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 3:12 am
In Wasa v Lexington [2008] EWCA Civ 150, Lexington appealed against the decision of the English Commercial Court that it was not entitled to recover from its reinsurers in full its settlement with its insured, Alcoa. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 6:58 am
A recent ruling from the English Commercial Court illuminates one risk with the use of the Bermuda form arbitration clause: if the losing party is dissatisfied with the arbitration result, it may not be permitted to challenge the result under New York law in a New York court, but may instead be limited to challenging the arbitration award under English law in English court.In the case, C v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
In Filarsky v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 5:41 pm
Next week, in Schuette v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 8:38 am
The case of the day is Vitol S.A. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:31 am
JAMES ENGLISH, DR. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 7:16 am
The recent decision of the English Commercial court, Shanghai Shipyard Co Ltd. v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 2:30 pm
Camara v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
The judge considered the factors on secondary indications set out by Laddie J in Haberman v Jackel [1999] F.S.R. 683 (and approved by Jacob LJ in Schlumberger v Electromagnetic Geoservices [2010] EWC Civ 819). [read post]
8 May 2011, 5:18 pm
The Supreme Court of Israel sitting as the High Court of Justice has made available in English translation its important 2009 decision in Abu Rahme v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 8:20 am
The English Commercial Court in Gater Assets Limited v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 2:44 pm
On Wednesday, the Court heard oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:58 am
” Mississippi v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 6:31 pm
United States in Plain English. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:32 am
Every time you're thinking about referring to the English Rule, let's call it the Alaska Rule instead. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:35 pm
Coakley in Plain English. [read post]
