Search for: "Grutter v. Bollinger" Results 381 - 400 of 443
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2011, 4:43 am
Bollinger applies what it calls strict scrutiny, albeit in a way that is more deferential to government employing an assertedly benign racial classification than it applies in cases involving challenges to laws disadvantaging racial minorities; Lawrence v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 2:51 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Taking those two together, as I believe is correct when there is no majority opinion, see CJLF's brief in Grutter v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:18 am by Jamal Greene
He also referred to Korematsu in his dissent in Grutter v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:50 am by Matthew Scarola
” The case is a follow-up to the Court’s 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 2:31 pm by Mark Walsh
He notes that on the day in 2003 when the Court reaffirmed the ability of universities to consider race in admissions, in Grutter v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm by Kedar Bhatia
Bollinger, permit the University of Texas at Austin’s use of race in undergraduate admissions decisions. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 12:23 pm by Anastasia Boden and Elizabeth Slattery
Breyer supported affirmative action, once saying that his vote to uphold racial preferences in Grutter v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 12:02 pm by Gail Heriot
MCRI was passed in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 9:55 am by Melissa Hart
University of Texas, the Court affirmed the holding in Grutter v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 4:03 am by SHG
Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, the deciding vote in 2003’s Grutter v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:06 pm by Andrew Hamm
University of North Carolina 21-707Issues: (1) Whether the Supreme Court should overrule Grutter v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
Regents of the University of California (and later Grutter v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 8:11 am by John Paul Schnapper-Casteras
  In Fisher I, a seven-to-one majority declined to question the Court’s prior precedents (including its seminal 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]