Search for: "HOPE v. STATE" Results 381 - 400 of 14,506
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2008, 5:42 pm
Since I'm still feeling a bit under the weather, I'm happy to direct you to other posts around the web on the case to fill the void in my coverage:Court allows taxing bond interest, attack on child pornMore on United States v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 9:46 am by tahminawatson
 It is hoped that the rule will be applied to the people in the US in the near future, the comment period is still pending. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:15 pm by Brian Shiffrin
I'm writing now to report that on March 21, 2011 the United States Supreme Court denied petitions for certiorari in Portalatin v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 3:56 am
  Given the evidence presented, the jury was completely right in saying that the State did not prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 9:02 pm by Series of Essays
Brnovich and Its Implications September 20, 2021 | Joshua Sellers, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law The Supreme Court’s decision in Brnovich v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 4:05 pm by Dwight Sullivan
As noted yesterday, CAAF’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 9:16 pm by Edward X. Clinton, Jr.
This is a thorough opinion by Judge Robert Dow, dismissing a legal malpractice claim against a real estate attorney, Hope Geldes. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 11:25 am by Mike
House disguised as a Barn In Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor v Welwyn Hatfield BC [2011] UKSC 15 Lord Hope describe the actions of Mr Beesely thus: "Frankly, the dishonesty involved in this case is so far removed from almost anything else that I have ever encountered in this area of the law that it appears to constitute a category all of its own. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 11:25 am by Mike
House disguised as a Barn In Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor v Welwyn Hatfield BC [2011] UKSC 15 Lord Hope describe the actions of Mr Beesely thus: "Frankly, the dishonesty involved in this case is so far removed from almost anything else that I have ever encountered in this area of the law that it appears to constitute a category all of its own. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
And the Strasbourg Court has stated unambiguously that it regards the strictest institution permitted by UK law, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), to be a  ”fully independent court” which is best placed to ensure that no material was unnecessarily withheld from the detainee (A v United Kingdom 49 EHRR 695). [read post]