Search for: "Kent Scheidegger"
Results 381 - 400
of 600
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2015, 5:12 am
” Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger, who analyzes the decision for Crime and Consequences; and from Hadir Aviram, who at PrawfsBlawg contends that Justice Kennedy’s concurrence “marks [him] as the guardian of dignity wherever prisons are concerned. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:27 am
Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences praises the decision in a series of two posts. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 3:59 am
” Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences also finds the “divisions over precedent … more interesting than the divisions over jury trial. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 2:58 am
" Kent ignores the attenuation language. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:16 am
Scheidegger Criminal Justice Legal Foundation (916) 446-0345 2131 L Street Sacramento, CA 95816 kent@scheidegger@CJLF.org Party name: Legion of Valor of the United States, et al. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:19 am
Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger comments on Rosales-Mireles and Chavez-Meza. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:46 am
Commentary on the decision comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger has two posts (here and here) discussing the case. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:31 am
” Coverage and commentary comes from the Associated Press, Hillary Stemple at JURIST, and Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger remarks that “[t]he defense side ‘won’ [this] case, but it may be a Pyrrhic victory,” and that “[h]ow the decision is applied in practice, as always, remains to be seen. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 4:46 am
An hour and 57 minutes.He gasped some 650 times for all but the last 17 minutes or so.They gave him the fucking drugs a second time because, well, who knew if he'd ever die.It was torture said John McCain who knows a thing or two about torture.Smooth sailing said Jan Brewer and the AG and Kent Scheidegger and a spokesman for Arizona's DOC who all declared, with the certainty of the ignorant, that he was sound asleep through the whole thing and felt absolutely no pain or… [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 2:21 pm
The Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, an organization devoted to the execution of as many people as humanly possible, promptly issued a press release quoting its Legal Director, Kent Scheidegger. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 12:42 pm
”But Kent Scheidegger, the legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation in Sacramento, which supports the death penalty, said he doubted that the state’s new protocol would merit a Supreme Court review. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 4:02 am
But the evil addressed in Judge Ellis’ decision is one of self-aggrandizement, which is demonstrated (in spades) in a comment to Eugene’s post: This is where it smells like a scam, a guy (who just happens, in this instance, to be Kent Scheidegger of the notorious Crime & Consequences blog, where no jay-walking defendant deserves less than death). [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 6:56 am
" Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, which supports the death penalty, said problems with veins were inevitable in lethal injection by IV. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:24 am
At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger is “still waiting on Cullen v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 1:33 pm
" Prosecutors and death penalty supporters blame the culture of criminal defense work or, as Kent Scheidegger, legal director Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, put it, the zeal "to turn over every rock in the world. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger criticizes the concurrence by Justices Scalia and Thomas, in whose view respondent Buono lacked standing to challenge the cross; Scheidegger complains that “[s]plintered opinions that fail to provide such answers constitute a failure of the institution. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
At the Crime & Consequences blog, Kent Scheidegger opines on the criminal-law implications of Thursday’s McGirt ruling. [read post]
