Search for: "Kent Scheidegger"
Results 381 - 400
of 601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2009, 4:02 am
I think the aspect of the case that may help more people, though, is to debunk forever the propagandistic wives' tales upon which all arson "forensics" was based before the mid-'90s.Doug Berman wondered why the usual pro-death penalty writers have been silent regarding these new developments, but Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences said the Willingham news was not the kind of major event that demanded immediate comment. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 7:17 pm
At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger had some very interesting policy arguments to make:Along with the constitutional problems, civil commitment is a problem because it takes another step down a road we have already traveled too far -- the medicalization of crime. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 2:58 am
" Kent ignores the attenuation language. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 3:59 am
” Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences also finds the “divisions over precedent … more interesting than the divisions over jury trial. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:46 am
Commentary on the decision comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:19 am
Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger has two posts (here and here) discussing the case. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger comments on Rosales-Mireles and Chavez-Meza. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:27 am
Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences praises the decision in a series of two posts. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:12 am
” Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger, who analyzes the decision for Crime and Consequences; and from Hadir Aviram, who at PrawfsBlawg contends that Justice Kennedy’s concurrence “marks [him] as the guardian of dignity wherever prisons are concerned. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:16 am
Scheidegger Criminal Justice Legal Foundation (916) 446-0345 2131 L Street Sacramento, CA 95816 kent@scheidegger@CJLF.org Party name: Legion of Valor of the United States, et al. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:31 am
” Coverage and commentary comes from the Associated Press, Hillary Stemple at JURIST, and Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 2:21 pm
The Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, an organization devoted to the execution of as many people as humanly possible, promptly issued a press release quoting its Legal Director, Kent Scheidegger. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 4:46 am
An hour and 57 minutes.He gasped some 650 times for all but the last 17 minutes or so.They gave him the fucking drugs a second time because, well, who knew if he'd ever die.It was torture said John McCain who knows a thing or two about torture.Smooth sailing said Jan Brewer and the AG and Kent Scheidegger and a spokesman for Arizona's DOC who all declared, with the certainty of the ignorant, that he was sound asleep through the whole thing and felt absolutely no pain or… [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger remarks that “[t]he defense side ‘won’ [this] case, but it may be a Pyrrhic victory,” and that “[h]ow the decision is applied in practice, as always, remains to be seen. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 1:05 am
"I hear the pain in their voices as they get frustrated with the system," Scheidegger said. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 4:02 am
But the evil addressed in Judge Ellis’ decision is one of self-aggrandizement, which is demonstrated (in spades) in a comment to Eugene’s post: This is where it smells like a scam, a guy (who just happens, in this instance, to be Kent Scheidegger of the notorious Crime & Consequences blog, where no jay-walking defendant deserves less than death). [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
At the Crime & Consequences blog, Kent Scheidegger opines on the criminal-law implications of Thursday’s McGirt ruling. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 12:42 pm
”But Kent Scheidegger, the legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation in Sacramento, which supports the death penalty, said he doubted that the state’s new protocol would merit a Supreme Court review. [read post]
11 May 2019, 4:52 am
“The case for the death penalty is the moral part of it,” said Kent Scheidegger, the legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, an organization in Sacramento that favors the death penalty and supported a ballot initiative in 2016 in which voters approved fast-tracking executions. [read post]
