Search for: "Larson v. Larson" Results 381 - 400 of 428
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2009, 6:39 pm
Since our appellate courts have held that the surcharge is "punishment", People v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 5:01 am by Steve Lombardi
However, Illinois Courts have recognized a more modem theory as suggested by Professor Larson which suggests that, 'there must be the intentional doing of something of a quasi-criminal nature, either with knowledge, that is likely to result in serious injury, or with wanton disregard of probable consequences.' Stembridge Builders v. [read post]
28 Feb 2006, 11:42 pm
Cir. 2005)), and PATENTS.COM (In re Oppedahl & Larson LLP, 71 USPQ2d 1370 (Fed. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 10:07 am by Ernie Svenson
A little book called Edit Yourself by Bruce Ross-Larson is priceless as well. [read post]