Search for: "Law v. USA" Results 381 - 400 of 6,904
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Any error in the Board’s claim construction was harmless and substantial evidence, including the claim language and expert testimony, supported the Board’s findings of motivation to combine (Bot M8 LLC v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 5:59 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
He has written one opinion in an Indian law case, Vann v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 5:17 am by Mark Engstrom
  More from our authors: The Unitary Patent and the Unified Patent Court by Pieter Callens & Sam Granata€ 150 3D Printing, Intellectual Property and Innovation: Insights from Law and Technology by Rosa Maria Ballardini, Marcus Norrgård, Jouni Partanen€ 128 The post USA: Exmark Manufacturing Company, Inc.… [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:49 am by John McFarland
The Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio handed down an opinion this week in Adams v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:39 pm
Ohio July 18, 2014) (“Outside of labor law or ERISA claims, courts tend not to supplant state corporate liability doctrine with federal common law. [read post]
14 May 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Chase Bank USA, N.A., 513 F.3d 1032 (9th Cir. 2008): Although we are reluctant to create a split of authority with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on a point of federal law, our understanding of the authorities discussed above requires us to do so. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 9:54 pm
The Eleventh Circuit distinguished the case of USA v Emmanual from that of USA v Behetey and ruled that a foreign national subject to a wiretap abroad, is not protected by the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 1:00 pm
I've now had a chance to review the complaint in Van Etten v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
DOES 1-99 ND Illi 2013http://t.co/namjuCtHIZ -> Supreme Court Denies Leave To Appeal In C-Map USA Inc., et al. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
A witness statement referred to advice received from a practising American lawyer on the SPEECH Act, a federal version of the ‘Rachel’s Law’ statute introduced in New York State following a campaign by the Defendant in Bin Mahfouz v Ehrenfeld ([2005] EWHC 1156 (QB)] (a case in which an American author was found to have libelled a Saudi billionaire in a book published in the USA). [read post]