Search for: "Lemon v. State" Results 381 - 400 of 455
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2016, 8:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 McKenna: sometimes it’s just a state of uncertainty (difficulty in understanding) v. false actual belief. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 11:00 am by Jana Singer
  Purporting to apply the three-part Establishment Clause test from Lemon v Kurtzman, the Court found that it was a permissible secular purpose “to alleviate significant governmental interference with the ability of religious organizations to define and carry out their religious missions. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:56 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Other examples of taste enhancement by congruent volatile compounds include the use of citral (lemon-like), ethyl butyrate, benzaldehyde, and pineapple flavoring enhancement of sweetness as well as peach aroma enhancement of sweetness intensity and duration. [0015]Studies have also reported that an odor can suppress perceived flavor intensity when the taste-odor pair is not congruent (or non-congruent). [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:34 am by Rick Garnett
A short version, though, is that, a little more than 50 years ago, in Lemon v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 2:50 pm
While the law of unconscionability differs a great deal from state to state, in most states it has two general components: "procedural unconscionability" (that relates to how a contract was formed), and "substantive unconscionability" (which relates to the unfairness of particular contract terms). [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 2:32 pm by Clerquette LeClerq
Collins, for example, describes one of her first oral arguments, in United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The problem for the states in these cases is that if their only reason to ban same-sex marriage is religious, the bans are unconstitutional under Lemon v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
It stated all the dosages correctly as well as the consequences of overdose. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm by Ad Law Defense
§ 337(a) (“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of [the FDCA] shall be by and in the name of the United States”); see POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm by Ad Law Defense
§ 337(a) (“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of [the FDCA] shall be by and in the name of the United States”); see POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 10:03 pm
Chris Peterson blogged on Monday  about the Supreme Court's decision, in the Cuomo v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
Journalism and the PCC There are no adjudicated PCC rulings to report, but several “resolved” cases including: Miss Catherine Lemon v Western Daily Press (Clause 1, 20/01/2012); A woman v The People (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); A woman v Daily Mail (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Ayr Advertiser (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Sunday Mail (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Dr Esther Hobson v The Star… [read post]