Search for: "Maine Employee Rights Group"
Results 381 - 400
of 2,045
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2015, 8:42 pm
The most sweeping measure so far is the San Francisco Retail Workers’ Bill of Rights, enacted in 2014, which provide retail employees working within the municipality with heightened hours and retention protections, and fair scheduling and treatment. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 6:30 am
All rights reserved under International Copyright Law. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:00 pm
Being in the risk group alone likely does not mean that an employee is in danger while at work. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 7:21 am
As the Supreme Court has specifically stated: “[W]e are beyond the day when an employer could evaluate employees by assuming or insisting that they matched the stereotype associated with the group. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 7:55 am
A current debate in Rhode Island concerns the voting rights of the criminally insane. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 11:03 am
“Without court access, federal employee whistleblower rights are non-existent,” says whistleblower attorney Stephen M. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 11:03 am
“Without court access, federal employee whistleblower rights are non-existent,” says whistleblower attorney Stephen M. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 9:32 pm
Analysts famed the case by considering whether a media company’s free speech right to decide who produces content that’s distributed to an audience of millions supersedes the employee’s right to a discrimination-free workplace. [read post]
2 May 2010, 8:16 pm
David Harlow: Right, okay; sounds like that makes sense. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 8:44 pm
Prohibition against interfering with, restraining, or denying an employee’s right to leave under PDL or CFRA AB 592 clarifies that it is an unlawful employment practice to “interfere with, restrain or deny the exercise or attempt to exercise” rights to a leave of absence under the California Family Rights Act (CFRA) or the PDL. [read post]
23 May 2010, 4:19 am
"Divisional CourtThe main issue was whether the Tribunal erred in its interpretation of section 24(1)(a) of the Code. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 8:31 am
It provides a roadmap and detailed explanations for organizational leaders, managers, GLBT affinity groups, and employees who want to get their employers on the right track with authoritative information targeted to the modern workplace. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 1:25 pm
Contact the employment attorneys at Nassiri Law Group, practicing in Orange County, Riverside and Los Angeles. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm
The center also discusses the rights of citizens during criminal investigations, including Miranda rights and search and seizure rules based on the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:09 pm
Yesterday I attended the Coral Gables Forum candidates’ debate for Coral Gables Commission Group V election. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:31 am
Yet labour law has also served the purpose to codify the authority of the employers over their employees while, in return, recognising them the entitlement to certain rights they can invoke against the employer itself. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:34 am
The policy should carefully carve out and protect employee’s specific rights under NLRA; a general saving clause is insufficient. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 2:38 pm
Like the discrimination under article 14, it is submitted that the interference with the article 8 rights is not justified. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 6:46 am
New Jersey employees should be aware of their rights under both federal and state laws. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 2:43 pm
However, perhaps one of the main challenges they face is how to keep employees safe, even when one of them tests positive for or is exposed to COVID-19. [read post]
