Search for: "Maine v. Superior Court"
Results 381 - 400
of 899
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2020, 7:37 am
No mea culpa, no money damages As to the normally requested remedy in such cases–money damages–the vice chancellor noted PHC has not requested that here, although it has a related suit pending in the Delaware Superior Court for defamation—which must be heard by a jury and where damages are an available remedy. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 8:54 am
Superior Court of San Francisco City held that the SCA prohibits criminal defendants from doing the same to build their defense case before trial. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 3:48 pm
Center For Biological Diversity, et al. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 8:13 am
In August, Pennsylvania’s Superior Court handed down a ruling in Pringle v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
” “The closest parallel is a Ninth Circuit case called Ellis v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 3:00 am
Pazol v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
In Alden v Maine, 527 US 706, the Supreme Court of the United States found that State sovereign immunity is "implicit in the constitutional design. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
Superior Court of California, San Francisco County, the justices reversed a state court finding of specific personal jurisdiction over out-of-state plaintiffs in a multistate lawsuit. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 6:57 am
Gould v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
” Harassment law divided into two main questions: Did actionable harassment occur? [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:12 am
The Supreme Court in Surya Devi Rai v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 5:14 am
Spoerle v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Ted has previously written about Canadian cases dealing with the issue of service of process under the Hague Service Convention, including a recent post on the Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision in Khan Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 11:12 am
The government’s Newman petition relied heavily on a 1983 Supreme Court decision in Dirks v. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 1:11 am
"Preliminary" means that the ECJ answers the question, and then the national court resumes its proceedings and enters its judgment, as opposed to a traditional appeal from a final judgment.When I saw the question referred to the ECJ, I already noticed that it was very well written, and I wish the Dusseldorf Regional Court had done a similarly good job in that Nokia v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 3:21 am
Intertape Polymer Corp. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 9:18 am
The en banc court reversed the panel due to CAAF's opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re remarks that although “the justices ultimately chose not to address the precedential significance of 4-1-4 decisions,” “the Court’s ruling still managed to undermine one of the main defenses of the Marks rule” for extracting precedent from fragmented opinions, which finds the Marks rule “desirable because it aligns with the ‘predictive model’ of precedent, whereby lower courts strive to… [read post]
