Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 381 - 400 of 16,303
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2020, 3:18 am by SHG
Doing something is another matter, and it’s doubtful that anything I have to say matters enough to get anyone to do something. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 11:41 am
"  The idea is that, because Heller won't overturn many statutes, it's doesn't matter much. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 12:30 am by John Diekman
Makhani, NY Slip Op 00577 (1st Dep't January 31, 2017)Tomorrow's issue:  Vacating a default judgment. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 2:07 am
 Notwithstanding those facts, Morgan Stanley reported the matter as a "customer complaint" and marked up the stockbroker's industry record. [read post]
The post Poised to Make Her Mark in the DEI Space appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
The post Poised to Make Her Mark in the DEI Space appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 4:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  They didn’t encounter the physical good in question, even if they might be aware that such a file exists; from their perspectives, it wouldn’t matter whether the track came from a disk, a hard drive, or from streaming video.True, the Sound Choice mark and trade dress would be displayed, and patrons might assume that they were seeing “a genuine, authorized Slep-Tone product when in fact it is a bootleg copy. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Rather it appears that what is required is that for the skilled person the value has to be recognisable as a singularity, as in decision T 201/83 within or at the end of a range of possibilities which may mark an end-point for a particular sub-range (cf. decision T 201/83 [8-9]).[18] In the present case […] the description as filed discloses that: “In a more preferred embodiment [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 3:35 am by Eleonora Rosati
If this seems like a déjà vu, it is because it is: indeed, back in 2020 the EU General Court (GC) already considered this question (T-105/19, covered on The IPKat here). [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 1:14 am
’”While the Board noted that “[t]here is no per se rule regarding the registrability based on the size or location of a mark on clothing,” it rejected Applicant’s argument and reiterated the importance of the commercial impression the mark makes on consumers: “[Because] the bearded skull design is emblazoned across the center of the t-shirt as an integral part a larger design that will be perceive [sic] as part of thematic whole… [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:33 am
In this likely event, it will not be a laughing matter! [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 9:34 am by anna su
But somehow it just doesn't look right.We can look at this issue in different ways. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:44 am by John L. Welch
In a precedential ruling, the Board affirmed a refusal to register the mark Clothing Facts in standard character form for various clothing items, on the ground that the mark as appearing on the specimens of use functions as informational matter and not as a source-identifier. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 7:55 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
The subtitle of the book, Advice about Lawyering, In-House and Out, That Only the Internet Could Provide fairly sums up its subject matter. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:04 am by Dennis Crouch
[T]he Lanham Act permits registration of marks that champion society’s sense of rectitude and morality, but not marks that denigrate those concepts. . . . [read post]