Search for: "McDonnell & McDonnell v. State" Results 381 - 400 of 511
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
While Lessig treats Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 6:00 am by Andrew Hamm
§ 666 should be construed to include quasi-sovereign public international entities like the United Nations; and (2) whether the official-act requirement under McDonnell v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Medicare Fraud: CLINIC OWNERS GET PRISON FOR STEALING MEDICARE FUNDS, United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 3:09 pm by Parks, Chesin & Walbert
When an employee opts for the latter route, courts will assess the case using the framework set out in McDonnell-Douglas v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
Christopher Meyer looks at the impact of last Term’s decision in Baker Botts v. [read post]