Search for: "People v. Evans"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2024, 8:16 am
Years ago, it was the little things, telling people to vote the day after the election. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
And if he is subpoenaed to testify before Congress, a strong argument can be made that he can, and should, say more.A 2000 DOJ Opinion, on which I worked while I was a deputy in the Office of Legal Counsel, reaffirmed a Watergate-era DOJ determination that criminally prosecuting a sitting President would violate the constitutional principle of separation of powers, even after the Supreme Court decided in Clinton v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:00 am
” The latest Edelman Trust survey has revealed that two-thirds (67%) of people globally have said that they believe journalists purposely try to mislead people by saying things that are false or grossly exaggerated. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
(Paragraph 18) The court was asked to decide and in effect narrow the law as set out by the Supreme Court of Canada in Evans v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 12:00 pm
Supreme Court's 2006 eBay v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 3:58 am
The text "guilty of misleading the American public" was at issue in the Lanham Act case Groden v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm
" But the First Amendment protects people's right to speak about others, including using others' images and "information about" them. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 1:44 pm
In Romer v. [read post]
ITC judge didn't buy testimony for which Qualcomm paid a single expert $3-4 million in Apple dispute
31 Oct 2018, 8:14 am
Evans' testimony to be decisive on all matters upon which she offered her testimony concerning Intel's intentions and plans," but he also describes testimony by other witnesses called by Apple (Dr. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 9:30 pm
Evan Wolfson’s Low Grade Photograph of Evan Wolfson by David Shakbone, courtesy of Wikimedia Commons. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 2:39 am
Evans, in which the Supreme Court struck down a law barring antidiscrimination protection for gay people. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 5:39 am
For example, when the Court decided the 1934 case of Blaisdell v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 9:29 am
” (People v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 2:22 pm
Rogers v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 11:48 am
More on Ring v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 11:27 am
The Rough Notes Company, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 11:27 am
The Rough Notes Company, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 12:52 pm
In an interview on Law.com, Chemerinsky stated he thinks this case has the “potential to be the Brown v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:41 am
Image via CrunchBaseIn Young v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:22 am
" [Above the Law] "People v. [read post]