Search for: "People v. Evans" Results 381 - 400 of 1,104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Evan Caminker
And if he is subpoenaed to testify before Congress, a strong argument can be made that he can, and should, say more.A 2000 DOJ Opinion, on which I worked while I was a deputy in the Office of Legal Counsel, reaffirmed a Watergate-era DOJ determination that criminally prosecuting a sitting President would violate the constitutional principle of separation of powers, even after the Supreme Court decided in Clinton v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:00 am by INFORRM
” The latest Edelman Trust survey has revealed that two-thirds (67%) of people globally have said that they believe journalists purposely try to mislead people by saying things that are false or grossly exaggerated. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm by David McDonald
(Paragraph 18) The court was asked to decide and in effect narrow the law as set out by the Supreme Court of Canada in Evans v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 3:58 am
The text "guilty of misleading the American public" was at issue in the Lanham Act case Groden v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
" But the First Amendment protects people's right to speak about others, including using others' images and "information about" them. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 8:14 am by Florian Mueller
Evans' testimony to be decisive on all matters upon which she offered her testimony concerning Intel's intentions and plans," but he also describes testimony by other witnesses called by Apple (Dr. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 9:30 pm by Marie-Amélie George
 Evan Wolfson’s Low Grade Photograph of Evan Wolfson by David Shakbone, courtesy of Wikimedia Commons. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 2:39 am
Evans, in which the Supreme Court struck down a law barring antidiscrimination protection for gay people. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 5:39 am by Walter Olson
For example, when the Court decided the 1934 case of Blaisdell v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 12:52 pm by Savanna Nolan
In an interview on Law.com, Chemerinsky stated he thinks this case has the “potential to be the Brown v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:22 am
" [Above the Law] "People v. [read post]