Search for: "People v. Kelly"
Results 381 - 400
of 849
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2019, 9:27 am
No. 1 v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:27 am
No. 1 v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 12:23 pm
In 1983, in a Lambda Legal case, People v. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 2:18 am
Vaughn Kelly Subscription Required
BRONX COUNTY Criminal Practice
Defendant Allowed to Withdraw Plea, as Court Could Not Abide by Plea and Sentence Terms
People v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 4:22 am
” Coverage of Wearry v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 8:05 am
Based on precedent set by cases like Kelly v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 4:22 pm
[United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 1:04 pm
Del Rio Sanchez v Simple Properties Management Limited. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 9:15 am
While the English v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 2:21 pm
Washington Square v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 7:54 am
Espinoza v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 1:40 pm
People hate to hear that they’ve missed the point. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 12:14 pm
Carrier/Kreiner v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 4:23 pm
Kelly v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:15 am
Milligan-Grimstad v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:15 am
Milligan-Grimstad v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm
Kelly, a case the Court took up and then dropped seven years ago. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 5:49 pm
So, Above the Law readers: How would you vote in Commonwealth v. [read post]
