Search for: "Royal v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,950
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2021, 9:04 am
‘Un Somaro Piumato’--Rethinking the Scope and Nature of State Liability for Acts of their Commercial Instrumentalities: State Owned Enterprises and State-Owner Liability in the Post-Global Larry Catá Backer[1] Abstract: Under what circumstances might a state be subject to liability for the conduct of its state owned enterprises (SOEs)? [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 4:33 am
In reversing that decision, McPhail made an intentionalist "spirit v. letter of the rule" decision. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:29 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 569 U. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 3:43 am
In this post, Ross Ludlow, Legal Support Assistant at Matrix Chambers, comments on the case of R v Maughan (Northern Ireland) [2022] UKSC 13. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 1:19 am
High Court (Chancery Division) Public Trustee v Butler & Anor [2012] EWHC 858 (Ch) (03 April 2012) DKH Retail Ltd v Republic (Retail) Ltd [2012] EWHC 877 (Ch) (03 April 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) J Preston & Sons Ltd [2012] EWHC 870 (QB) (03 April 2012) Letts v Royal Sun Alliance Plc [2012] EWHC 875 (QB) (03 April 2012) The Serious Organised Crime Agency v Robb [2012] EWHC 803 (QB) (30 March 2012) Sharif, R. v… [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 10:00 am
Their views, and those of other critics, were relayed by State Governors and the outgoing Governor-General, who added comments revealing their anti-Semitic hostility to Isaacs and their determination to oppose the appointment regardless of the views of the governments that advised them. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:15 am
Article 10: The right to receive information Mr Sugar argued that he had the right to disclosure of the Report under Article 10 ECHR which he said recent Strasbourg case law made clear recognised a right of access to information (referring specifically to Matky v Czech Republic, Tarsasag v Hungary and Kenedi v Hungary). [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 8:58 am
The following contribution to our Kiobel v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 2:03 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Neil Martin Ltd v HM Revenue & Customs [2007] EWCA Civ 1041 (25 October 2007) Cadogan & Anor v Sportelli & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 1042 (25 October 2007) Boudh v Bodh [2007] EWCA Civ 1019 (25 October 2007) AA (Somalia) v SSHD [2007] EWCA Civ 1040 (25 October 2007) Kohn v Wagschal & Ors [2007] EWCA Civ 1022 (24 October 2007) Poole & Ors v HM Treasury [2007] EWCA Civ 1021… [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 10:21 am
Co. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 3:15 pm
In particular, the court found guidance in the opinions of the state Supreme Court in cases such as Hecla Mining v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 8:19 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) K (Children), Re [2012] EWCA Civ 1549 (29 November 2012) Alfa Laval Tumba AB & Anor v Separator Spares International Ltd & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 1569 (29 November 2012) Birmingham City Council v Ashton [2012] EWCA Civ 1557 (29 November 2012) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Ligaya Nursing v R [2012] EWCA Crim 2521 (30 November 2012) Ravjani & Ors, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2519 (29 November 2012) Shabir, R. v… [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:51 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum and Morrison v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 6:44 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) The Trademark Licensing Co Ltd & Anor v Leofelis SA [2012] EWCA Civ 985 (23 July 2012) Faraday Reinsurance Co Ltd v Howden North America Inc & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 980 (20 July 2012) O’Cathail v Transport for London [2012] EWCA Civ 1004 (20 July 2012) Michael & Ors v South Wales Police & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 981 (20 July 2012) Konodyba v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea [2012] EWCA Civ… [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:43 pm
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:22 am
You’ve Been Served Angellino v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:22 am
You’ve Been Served Angellino v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 1:59 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 10:27 pm
Jackson v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 8:38 am
Problem 11 --State of Missouri v. [read post]
