Search for: "SEC v. Wills" Results 381 - 400 of 482
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2014, 12:28 am by Kevin LaCroix
In support of its position, the insurer relied on case law (including the Seventh Circuit’s 2001 opinion in Level 3 Communications Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The world of directors’ and officers’ liability is always dynamic, but 2017 was a particularly eventful year in the D&O liability arena. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
Following an eleven month sales process involving thirty potential bidders that resulted in a sale price that was $2.00 per share higher than the price initially proposed by CVCI and $0.65 per share higher than any other bidder was willing to pay, Ness Technologies entered into a merger agreement with CVCI pursuant to which each outstanding share of Ness Technologies common stock would be converted into the right to receive $7.75 in cash. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 12:41 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
Congress specifically defined the conduct that could constitute an unfair labor practice under Secs. 8(a) and 10(a) of the Act. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 5:27 am
A big challenge in EDD is that few are willing to invest to test different approaches. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Following a hack into Jones’ computer system, the SEC brought the aforementioned enforcement action against Jones for non-compliance with a regulatory rule requiring investment managers to adopt cyber-security policies and procedures. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
The SEC’s investigatory and enforcement efforts are likely to remain active and aggressive, particularly in light of the recent criticism that the SEC failed to adequately investigate Bernard Madoff’s investment business. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Armstead, No. 05-5157 Convictions for felony willful copyright infringement for private financial gain are affirmed over allegations that the government failed to produce sufficient evidence that DVDs sold had an aggregate value of more than $2,500 in "retail value" as used in section 2319(b)(1). [read post]