Search for: "Shields v. United States" Results 381 - 400 of 2,215
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2015, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
  On June 26, 2013, when the Supreme Court decided the case of United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:20 pm by INFORRM
This has been confirmed by United States courts, the European Court of Justice and the special mandates on freedom of expression alike. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:02 pm
" (U.S. allows lawsuits against Cuban entities but shields foreign firms for now).The text of the State Department Media Note, some additional reporting, and the Text of Title III of the LIBERTAD Act follows.Secretary Enacts 30-Day Suspension of Title III (LIBERTAD Act) With an ExceptionMedia NoteOffice of the SpokespersonWashington, DCMarch 4, 2019Today, Secretary Pompeo reported to the appropriate Congressional committees his determination that an additional suspension for… [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
This principle was famously laid down in the case of Sidhu v British Airways (where passengers could not sue at common law for harm resulting from their plane having been high jacked following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait), and subsequently applied by senior courts around the world, including notably the United States Supreme Court in El Al Israel Airlines v Tseng (though Justice Stevens there dissented). [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 6:06 pm by Andrew Frisch
Considering that the Supreme Court instructs that privileges are “not lightly created nor expansively construed, for they are in derogation of the search for truth,” United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 1:49 pm
It led to a strong judicial slapdown of the Department of Justice by one of our nation's leading jurists, in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf pushes back against Justice Clarence Thomas’ originalist critique of the First Amendment overbreadth doctrine in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:05 am by Sheppard Mullin
Major A recent decision by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas may have caused grave damage to protections long available to overseas government contractors and their employees under the Defense Base Act (“DBA”), 42 U.S.C. [read post]