Search for: "State v. Hobbs"
Results 381 - 400
of 720
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2016, 12:20 pm
” It is apparent from United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 10:15 am
United States — proof needed to convict a public official for criminal extortion under the Hobbs Act DirecTV v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 1:02 am
However, the judge did not err in applying Article 7(1)(e); what he had actually done was to state that the policy underlying that article was relevant to the assessment of whether there was a sufficient similarity for the purposes of Article 9(1)(c), both the mark and the sign being shapes. * An assessment of similarity had to be carried out on a global basis by reference to the degree of similarity between the mark and the sign (here the Court cited Case C-252/07 Intel Corp Inc v… [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
Weekly D386 (Fla. 1st DCA Feb. 14, 2012); Hobbs v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:22 pm
Just this month the Nevada Supreme Court in Hobbs v. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 1:48 pm
Trump v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae, New York v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:52 am
United States, in which the Court held that “‘a robber who affects or attempts to affect even the intrastate sale of marijuana grown within the state’ necessarily satisfies the ‘affects commerce’ element of the federal Hobbs Act criminal statute. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 12:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:03 am
Hobbs Vasquez v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 4:35 am
Ho v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 1:45 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEvidence Union Officer's Prior Bad Acts Admissible to Show Intent in Trial for Hobbs Act Extortion, Embezzlement United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 1:31 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEvidence Union Officer's Prior Bad Acts Admissible to Show Intent in Trial for Hobbs Act Extortion, Embezzlement United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:01 pm
Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs said last month that her family had received “utterly abhorrent” death threats after President Trump lost her state. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 2:20 pm
Hobbs. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 11:52 am
In other words, the employee does not have the right to designate his or her own attorney in such situations.* The Hobbs Act (18 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 11:50 am
The issue is whether such a recommendation qualifies as “property” under the Hobbs Act, which makes it a crime to obtain property by threats. ** United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 8:26 am
Hobbs provided a thorough review of the relevant case law on recusals, including a reference to the UK Post Office scandal in Bates v Post Office Limited [2019] EWHC 871 (QB), paragraphs [27]-[77] as well as HCA International Ltd v Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) [2015] EWCA Civ 492. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:56 am
In Holt v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 5:56 am
United States v. [read post]
