Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 381 - 400
of 7,397
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2011, 9:21 pm
Holder, 2011 U.S. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 10:20 pm
The Ninth Circuit found a Catch-22 for secret account holders in a case, In re Grand Jury Investigation M.H. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
§ 602(a)(1).That section provides that importing goods into the United States without the authority of the copyright holder is illegal. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
§ 602(a)(1).That section provides that importing goods into the United States without the authority of the copyright holder is illegal. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
§ 602(a)(1).That section provides that importing goods into the United States without the authority of the copyright holder is illegal. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:54 am
PRACTICE NOTE: Foreign copyright holders with substantial business in the United States should obtain U.S. copyright registrations to avail themselves of all remedies under the Copyright Act. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
S’holders Litig., No. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 10:57 am
The Supreme Court of the United States heard arguments yesterday (Nov. 10, 2009) on the issue of whether 8 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 4:15 am
Beginning with the landmark 2015 decision by the European Court of Justice in Huawei v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:00 am
Fola Coal Company, LLC, No. 161024 (4th Cir., 1/04/2017), the permit holder is noncompliant. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 10:07 am
Holder [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that a person convicted under state law for simple drug possession, a federal law misdemeanor, has not been "convicted" of an "aggravated felony" for immigration removal purposes. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 11:38 am
I have written about Beckman v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 7:35 pm
Holder that states with a long history of racial discrimination no longer needed to approve any proposed changes to their voting procedures with the federal government, as had long been required under the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 4:15 am
Beginning with the landmark 2015 decision by the European Court of Justice in Huawei v. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 11:43 am
Reclaim the Records v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 12:11 pm
The case, King v. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 5:15 am
However, the certificate of designation for the class also stated that holders of the preferred stock had "no voting rights. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 9:49 am
” In FTC v. [read post]
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered its long-awaited judgment in the case of Bowman v Monsanto Co. et Al., unanimously ruling that 'patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder's permission'. [read post]
