Search for: "State of Maine v. Peters"
Results 381 - 400
of 498
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2024, 8:56 pm
[…] Given this, and considering that the appealed decision overturned the exequatur decree of the judgment in question on the ground that the [Canadian] judgment, which recognized a judgment from the United States, was a “summary judgment” (hukm musta’jil) enforceable only in the rendering State, despite the broad wording of [the applicable provisions],[vii] which covers all judgments (kul al-ahkam) rendered in a foreign State without specifying… [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 3:34 am
Indeed, I remained an avid Os fan until about 2000, when I finally was no longer able to stomach what Peter Angelos was doing to the team. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
“The reasonable person”, wrote Justices Claire L’Heureux-Dubé and Beverley McLachlin in R. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 4:20 am
The court dismisses this request because it regards R. 158 RoP only applicable in main proceedings. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 2:55 am
Although the Court of Appeal was clear, in Neurim v Generics [2020] EWCA Civ 793, that deciding to uphold the lower court’s decision not to grant a pharmaceutical patent PI was based on the specific facts of that case, the Patents Court has subsequently refused two further pharmaceutical PIs (Neurim v Teva [2022] EWHC 954 (Pat) and [2022] EWHC 1641(Pat), and Novartis v Teva [2022] EWHC 959 (Ch)). [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:51 am
Baker v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
The group’s e-petition calls on the Ministry of Justice to “leave FoI alone”, stating, “the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOI) has exposed the scandal of MPs’ expenses, and many examples of waste and improper behaviour by public authorities, politicians and public officials. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
Justice BhandariThe Supreme Court in State of Uttranchal v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:13 am
For example, the majority and separate opinions in Jesner v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 8:57 pm
Two pumps are located on the main Wellton canal near the lateral canal split that supplies water to fields of the suspect farm; one gasoline powered pump on a trailer and one permanent electric pump with an attached hose. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 11:48 am
Pulte v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
In addition, we will continue to follow the trial and appeal, respectively, in the complex contempt of Congress cases involving former White House advisers Peter Navarro and Steve Bannon. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am
In the second, main part, the author, who is a member of the Commission's Expert Group on the arbitration interface, provides a detailed account and evaluation of the new lis pendens-mechanism established by the Commission proposal in order to effectively prevent parallel proceedings in the arbitration context. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 3:58 am
The main consideration was that a prosecution bar is not a normal step to take in UK litigation, especially in a “relatively generic” case such as this. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 1:17 am
If they become law, which is likely given the lack of opposition from any of the main parties, the justice system will look very different in the coming years. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:15 am
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 9:02 am
I grew up in Brunswick, Maine. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 6:17 am
., on Friday, July 5, 2019 Tags: Boards of Directors, Controlling shareholders, Dual-class stock, ESG, Institutional Investors, Lyft, Shareholder voting, Uber Director Independence and Oversight Obligation in Marchand v. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPEG),More on the implementation of the London Agreement and patent cost reduction in Europe: (Patent Baristas),ECJ rules that EU legislative obligations cannot be enforced in any Member State if that legislation has not been published in the Official Journal in the language of that Member State (Case C-161/06 OlomoucSkoma-Lux sro v Celni reditelstvi Olumouc): (IPKat),EPO fighting complex appl [read post]
