Search for: "State v. Garrett"
Results 381 - 400
of 593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am
Next, Ramos v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am
Next, Ramos v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 5:35 am
Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey April 6 charged a mergers and acquisitions attorney and a stock trader with conspiracy, securities fraud and other violations over their alleged roles in a long-running insider trading scheme that netted more than $32 million in illicit profits (United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 4:02 am
” At the Special Education Law Blog, Jim Gehrl weighs in on Endrew F. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 3:26 am
New York, “the next big fight will be whether states can draw legislative lines based only on the citizen voting age population. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 4:02 am
That article was a response to the Arizona v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 3:48 pm
That’s why, in cases like Munaf v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 11:06 am
In Move Eden Housing v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 3:47 am
” Briefly: Noting in his column for The Atlantic that “state legislatures in the Bible Belt are openly flirting with laws designed to thwart any Supreme Court decision requiring recognition of gay marriage,” Garrett Epps urges the Court “to say forthrightly that when any agents of the state—legislators, judges, clerks—discriminate on this basis, they violate both the Constitution and their oath. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 10:27 am
Taken August 28, 2005 by Garrett Fitzgerald. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 2:54 am
Garrett, a law professor at the University of Virginia. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 6:40 pm
The most notable is in Gonzales v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 11:09 am
His presence most likely means that the Supreme Court will start exploring and perhaps expanding the scope of the Second Amendment.The case is New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:21 am
At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps recalls several times when “government has decided to lower the boom on unpopular racial or religious groups,” and notes that “[s]urvivors of three of these previous episodes have filed amicus briefs [in the travel-ban case, Trump v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 9:23 am
In support of that notion, the Court cited the 1957 Texas Supreme Court case Garrett v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:22 am
Is it time to use Article V to amend Article V? [read post]
11 May 2011, 2:00 pm
Is it time to use Article V to amend Article V? [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 4:20 am
At The Volokh Conspiracy, William Baude discusses Jones v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 4:51 am
” Yesterday the Court issued a decision in United States v. [read post]
