Search for: "State v. Harmon"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2023, 5:54 pm
Ore.) in Hunter v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:27 am
This, in a nutshell, is the question which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) had been required to answer in Constantin Film v YouTube, C-264/19.The referral, which Germany’s Federal Court of Justice had made, focused on the interpretation of Article 8(2)(a) of the Enforcement Directive, a piece of EU legislation adopted in 2004.The background national proceedings had originated from the refusal, by YouTube and its parent company Google, to provide film producer… [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 9:08 am
State v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:10 am
More from our authors: Harmonizing European Copyright Law. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 5:21 am
Here we continue our discussion of the Texas Supreme Court’s opinion in Piranha Partners et al. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 5:18 am
There, the case was dismissed on a CPLR 3211 motion in a very short decision: “Plaintiff’s legal malpractice complaint was properly dismissed in accordance with CPLR 3211(a)(7) for failure to state a cause of action. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 5:51 am
The gloss thus harmonized "manifest disregard" with the holding that the Arbitration Act states the "exclusive" grounds for vacatur in Hall Street Assocs., L.L.C. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 11:47 am
Cefetra BV, Cefetra Feed Service BV, Cefetra Futures BV and State of Argentina and Monsanto Technology LLC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 11:47 am
The Container Store v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 9:41 am
., v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 4:25 am
Part V looks at the way these jurisdictions do interact on the temporal axis of history, that is, their actual influence on each other, which in the relevant jurisdictions currently takes the form of regulatory competition and legislative harmonization. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:30 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in South Dakota v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 3:18 am
The FPF Report mentions that the EDPB recommends the harmonization of procedural aspects of GDPR enforcement, with a focus on “the (i) status and rights of the parties to the administrative procedures, (ii) procedural deadlines, (iii) requirements for admissibility or dismissal of complaints, (iv) investigative powers of SAs, and (v) the overall implementation of the cooperation procedure”. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 1:56 pm
The Court harmonized its holding with the language of the Supreme Court in Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 2:55 pm
Ries v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 6:51 am
“The state’s broke. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:56 am
Frye v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 8:26 pm
See Larry Harmon Picture Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 8:26 pm
See Larry Harmon Picture Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 7:25 pm
State Police, 227 N.J. 482, 500 (2017), and Caraballo v. [read post]
