Search for: "State v. Harmon"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,228
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2014, 10:02 am
When we last left Dependable Packaging Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 12:25 pm
Cap Export, LLC v. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 8:43 am
Consider a recent UK Court of Appeals case (Symbian Ltd v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 6:51 am
In Townsend v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
Carey, 376 F.3d 841, 847–48 (9th Cir.2004) (relying on expert testimony comparing the objective elements—pitch, melodies, baselines, tempo, chords, structure, and harmonic rhythm—of musical works); Chiate v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 3:12 am
Presidential Proclamation 8818 of May 14, 2012, implemented U.S. tariff commitments under the United States-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement and incorporated by reference Publication 4320 of the United States International Trade Commission, entitled "Modifications to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to Implement the United States-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement." [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
"Prosecutors later initiated the civil forfeiture action of United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 11:30 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 4:16 pm
Shute, 499 U.S. 585, 595 (1991), and M/S Bremen v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 5:18 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 10:20 am
McCaughtry, 910 F.2d 1379, 1383 (CA7 1990) (dicta); Harmon v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 4:34 pm
For the most part, the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States has an internal logic and consistent format that eases navigation. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm
’s Office v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 1:17 pm
Citizens United indisputably harmonized campaign finance law on the question of the constitutionality of spending limits on corporations, even if its view of Austin as an “outlier” remains contested. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 7:22 am
Chambers V. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 11:00 am
ATRA v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 9:37 am
Below, Stanford Law School’s Jacqueline de Armas recaps Tuesday’s ruling in Graham County Soil & Water Dist. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
It is relevant to software, business methods and biotech inventions.* When trade mark components have little or no distinctivenessAs Valentina explains in her first post as guest Kat, back in 2011 OHIM and many national patent and trade mark offices agreed to harmonize their practices as regards trade marks and designs' absolute and relative grounds. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 4:00 am
The Alaska Supreme Court recognized a union-relations privilege in Peterson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 10:29 am
In his view, TVA v. [read post]
