Search for: "State v. Harrington"
Results 381 - 400
of 465
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2010, 3:18 pm
On April 1, 2010, Judge Terry Means of the United States Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a ruling in Highmark, Inc. v. [read post]
Trial judges cannot resolve material factual disputes upon conflicting affidavits and certifications
7 Apr 2010, 8:42 am
” Harrington v. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 2:30 pm
There are also three summary orders of interest.United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 1:34 pm
Summary of Decision issued March 22, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Singer v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 7:48 am
This was the issue presented to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania in MTV Transportation v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 5:15 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 6:08 pm
The Full Court dismissed the appeal on this point, saying that Justice Rose had not erred in the exercise of discretion.Stephen Page, Harrington Family Lawyers, Brisbane spage@harringtonfamilylawyers.com 61(7) 3221 9544 [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 7:09 am
Civil Procedure & Federal Courts Blog covers the Court’s grant of certiorari earlier this week in Harrington v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 7:28 am
That issue was raised by the state of California in Harrington v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 7:07 am
Humphries (09-350) and Harrington v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 6:39 am
”) At the Volokh Conspiracy, John Elwood writes about a petition that has been relisted twice, Harrington v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 4:57 pm
State v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 1:04 pm
There’s one thing about Harrington v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
United States Docket: 09-342 Issues: (1) What constitutes the proper denominator in the takings fraction under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 11:41 am
Humphries, 09–350 (relisted on 1/8/10, 1/15, and, apparently, 1/22), and Harrington v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 7:51 am
Harrington v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 7:34 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court granted petitioners' motion to dismiss the writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 46 in the spellcheck-challenging Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:38 pm
State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 4:57 am
State v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 1:28 pm
These matterswere previously dealt with exclusively bystate courts under state law however thenew Part VIIIAB puts these mattersunder the jurisdiction of the Family Court and theFederal MagistratesCourt.2.34 These amendments did not apply to termination agreements. [read post]