Search for: "State v. Poland"
Results 381 - 400
of 625
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
In his ruling on A & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health [2014] EWHC 1364 (Admin) Mr Justice King held that the claimant, whose ordinary/usual residence was in Northern Ireland, was not entitled to access in England abortion services free of charge. (13 May 2014). [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:25 am
A.V.Z (EPLAW) Poland Observations, oppositions, invalidations – who’s the party? [read post]
7 Nov 2020, 3:12 am
Decisions this Week IndiaAmit Sahni v. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 10:11 am
(AP / Times-Picayune / Lambda Legal press release) The case is Adar v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's Broadway… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's Broadway… [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
25 Jan 2025, 9:44 am
Stevens v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 12:44 am
The first ASI issued by a Wuhan court was in the Xiaomi v. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 11:50 pm
Back then, Poland was not a Member State of the EU (it joined in 2004) and was therefore not bound by EU law. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:07 am
(Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Loosely related state law claims sufficient for supplemental jurisdiction: Von Holdt v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am
Mountain States/Rosen L.L.C. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:55 am
: Firehouse Restaurant Group, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm
: General Motors LLC v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm
Singapore Two books that aim to better inform law practitioners on defamation cases and how tribunals should be managed were launched by the State Courts. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
: Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (PatLit) Is it safe? [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:28 am
Wares and Services Manual expands (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trade-marks: Use it as registered: Bigras v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:38 am
The EU has left member states to strike their own balances between these rights in formulating journalism exemptions from GDPR, and I would expect the UK approach to be very different to even that in France and Germany, let alone Poland or Hungary. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 3:34 am
: In re Jonathan Drew, Inc dba Drew Estate (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps National Association of Realtors - NAR alleges local real estate agents wrongly use REALTOR: National Association of Realtors v. [read post]
