Search for: "State v. Tate" Results 381 - 400 of 446
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am by INFORRM
United States The controversial social media personality Andrew Tate and his brother are suing a Florida woman for defamation, saying she falsely accused them of imprisoning her in Romania, leading to their arrest there on human trafficking charges. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(Spicy IP) Israel English version of Israel patent database available (The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office gears up for filing online (The IP Factor) Adjudicator of IP rules AMERICAN APPAREL lacks distinguishing features (The IP Factor) ‘Ein Gedi’ not acceptable as a word mark (The IP Factor) Japan Japan starts new patent prosecution highways with Austrian Patent Office and IP Office of Singapore (Managing Intellectual Property) Libya Libya cuts trade mark filing… [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 6:39 am by Eric Penzer
In affirming the Surrogate’s determination, the Court relied heavily on the Second Department’s decision in Mayorga v Tate, 302 AD2d 11 (2d Dept 2002). [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 6:46 am by Amy Bray
  As a result of the pro-government condemnation process traditionally in Georgia, and in response to the United States Supreme Court’s Kelo v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Tate, No. 07-4026 Conviction and sentence for possession of a firearm after having been convicted of a felony is vacated and the case remanded where the officer who wrote an affidavit used in support of a search warrant deliberately omitted facts about the location of the trash that the officer searched and upon which he based his finding of probable cause. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 9:02 am by Chimene Keitner
State Department to conclude that a given action was based upon a commercial activity, and that the foreign state or state entity was therefore immune from suit under the terms of the 1952 Tate Letter. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Justice Scalia famously said in his angry dissent from Lawrence v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:15 am by Telecommunications Practice Group
Section 253 provides that “no [s]tate or local statute or regulation, or other [s]tate or local legal requirement, may prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the ability of any entity to provide any interstate or intrastate telecommunications service. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am by Kelly
XX v HMRC (IP finance) United States US Patents  ‘Sub-standard’ patents cost the US economy over $25 billion a year. [read post]