Search for: "United States v. Pierce" Results 381 - 400 of 645
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sackett v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 8:44 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
  Last Monday, the United States Supreme Court denied a writ of certiorari to review the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruling in McReynolds v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 5:12 am by Nicole Kellner-Swick
He can be reached at 216.685.1062 and dbrown@weltman.com. ________________________________________ [1] Belvedere Condominium Unit Owners’ Assoc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 4:26 pm by Brad Pauley
  On its own motion, the Court stayed further briefing in this matter pending action by the United States Supreme Court in Merck & Co. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 12:04 pm by David Bernstein
Nebraska and Pierce v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:56 pm
In the United States, they are governed by the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 10:14 am by Michelle Yeary
   If the point was to distinguish Cabana from McGuan by saying that plaintiff Cabana is bringing a claim for violation of a federal regulation, not a state law tort claim -- well, we direct your attention back to square one:  the United States, not private litigants, enforces the FDCA and FDA regulations. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:16 am
Scott Pierce Requirement under subsection 102(f) of Title 35 of the United States Code that a person “himself invent the subject matter sought to be patented” has been removed by the Leahy-Smith American Invents Act (AIA) of 2011. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 7:55 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  Likewise, she rejected many other rulings from throughout the United States that have accepted the EEOC’s contention. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 8:25 am
Filed August 16, 2012) (click here for .pdf of Complaint) Debtor Raving Brands, Inc. was the subject of an involuntary case under Chapter 7 of Title 11 of the United States Code on April 1, 2009. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 9:17 am by Steve Hall
" Texas accomplished this unrepentant bit of business despite a 2002 decision of the United States Supreme Court styled Atkins v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 6:36 pm
An example of the FSIA piercing the this immunity is the decision by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in Malewicz v. [read post]