Search for: "United States v. Harry" Results 381 - 400 of 2,584
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2018, 6:55 am
The decision by the Kentucky Supreme Court last summer and its case, Indiana Insurance Company v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 6:07 am by Steven Cohen
Facts: This case (Quantum Fitness Corporation et al v. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:58 am by Arlo Kipfer
The main difference is that the United States is an employment at will system: employers can terminate employees at any time for pretty much any reason. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 4:22 am by SHG
And so begins its decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:37 am by Earl Drott
” Unfortunately for those injured by modern-day governments, the doctrine of sovereign immunity is still alive and well in the United States, even though our country has not been under the ostensible power of a king for centuries. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:02 am by Paul M. Secunda
This past year has been another active one for labor and employment law cases at the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 7:10 am by Kevin Schad appellate division SDOH
The Sixth Circuit has just released the case of United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
At this blog, Marty Lederman discusses the impact of last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 10:03 am
Moatz, Director of Enrollment & Discipline at the United States Patent and Trademark Office, outlined his office's new disciplinary procedures for registered patent practitioners. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 12:35 am
Washington D.C. is "the window through which the world looks into our house," wrote the Justice Department in the Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae in Brown v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 9:21 am by Rob McKinney
Two drug dog cases were heard were on the docket this week at the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 1:07 pm
United States, in which the Supreme Court held that police use of a heat-sensing device aimed at the exterior of a house to investigate a suspected marijuana grow operation was unconstitutional. [read post]