Search for: "United States v. Hunter"
Results 381 - 400
of 568
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2012, 1:41 pm
In April 2011, several years after the Court of Appeals had ordered the trial court to reconsider its prior order granting defendant’s motion to compel arbitration, the United States Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility, LLC v Concepcion, which reiterated the rule that the principal purpose of the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) is to ensure that arbitration agreements are enforced according to their terms and held that “[r]equiring the… [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:41 pm
In April 2011, several years after the Court of Appeals had ordered the trial court to reconsider its prior order granting defendant’s motion to compel arbitration, the United States Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility, LLC v Concepcion, which reiterated the rule that the principal purpose of the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) is to ensure that arbitration agreements are enforced according to their terms and held that “[r]equiring the… [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 10:25 am
For example, in Fletcher v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 4:00 am
State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 3:38 am
Hunter, which concerned the viability of the repeat violent offender specification after State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 1:16 pm
See United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 9:44 am
In relation to the new discretionary ground, I cannot add to what Andrew Arden QC and Caroline Hunter said in their editorial on the subject in the Journal of Housing Law last year (see [2011] JHL 115) and do not intend to do so. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 9:44 am
In relation to the new discretionary ground, I cannot add to what Andrew Arden QC and Caroline Hunter said in their editorial on the subject in the Journal of Housing Law last year (see [2011] JHL 115) and do not intend to do so. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 6:45 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 1:41 pm
Thus Story’s statement in Martin v. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 5:10 am
Frank Thorp V reports for NBC News. [read post]
3 May 2020, 8:55 pm
The departure from the American approach appears to have occurred as early as in 1875 in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
United States, 740 F.2d 1428, 1440 (8th Cir. 1984); Madsen v. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 7:48 am
The Supreme Court held in Lujan v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm
DorfMy latest Verdict column examines the all-but-endorsement of the unitary executive theory by Justices Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett in Friday's SCOTUS decision in United States ex rel Polansky v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:33 am
It did so on the basis of its allegation that the listing mechanism violated the California and United States Constitutions. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 3:05 pm
United States, 60 Fed. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:42 am
A member of the military forces of the United States or of any state of the United States in the performance of official duties; or 3. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:17 am
”) Panek v County of Albany, 99 N.Y.2d. 452, 458 (2003)(Removing a large air conditioning units two weeks before a demolition project was not part of or ancillary to the demolition, but was a "significant alteration" which is also an enumerated activity under the statute). [read post]
