Search for: "United States v. Interstate Circuit" Results 381 - 400 of 1,144
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2019, 1:20 pm by Arina Shulga
  It was unclear how to reconcile the Morrison case with the Congressional intent until the Tenth Circuit's decision in SEC v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:22 pm by WIMS
Oct 3: National Mining Association (NMA) President and CEO Hal Quinn announced that the association was filing a petition in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for reconsideration and stay and petition for review of U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 9:18 am by John Buhl
When he was on the Tenth Circuit, he wrote a concurring opinion in DMA v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 7:10 am by Nabiha Syed
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 2:43 pm
This is the key part of how the court resolved the ex post facto claim in United States v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:59 am by JB
What Congress may not do under the Commerce Clause is explained in United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 9:00 pm
In a controversial decision issued on February 25, a federal judge ruled that a moratorium on residential evictions, issued by the the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, violates the United States Constitution.In Terkel v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 3:47 pm by Bexis
Instead a duty-to-withdraw claim strikes at the heart of the FDA’s power to determine what prescription drugs are properly sold in interstate commerce in the United States:[A] state law duty that would compel generic manufacturers to stop production of a drug that under federal law they have the authority to produce . . . would directly conflict with the federal statutory scheme in which Congress vested sole authority with the FDA to determine whether a drug… [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 2:28 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
GreatWestern United Corp., 443 U.S. 173, 180 (1979). [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 1:47 pm by John Elwood
United States, 23-1281Issues: (1) Whether Feres v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:51 am by Sean Wajert
  Defendants removed the case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma pursuant to CAFA, 28 U.S.C. [read post]