Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 381 - 400
of 9,468
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
United States. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 5:15 am
Compevo AB v. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 2:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:14 am
(b) Any person may sue for the penalty, in which event one-half shall go to the person suing and the other to the use of the United States. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 2:47 pm
United States, 723 F.3d 1353, 1358 (Fed. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 12:47 am
Per UNITED STATES v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 8:28 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:00 am
Case date: 27 October 2021 Case number: No: 20-2277 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
5 May 2022, 4:25 am
" Lodestar then began use its mark in the United States in 2014.Lodestar won the priority battle but lost the trademark infringement war. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 7:33 pm
United States, 239 U.S. 510, 517–18 (1916)). [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:54 pm
Jeff: [question mark hovers over head]. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 6:32 am
Clemon (ret.), who not incidentally was the first African-American federal district court judge in the state; Judge Robert Sack of the Second Circuit; and Professors Sonja West (Georgia), Mark Tushnet (Harvard), RonNell Andersen Jones (BYU), David Anderson (Texas), and Christopher Schmidt (Chicago-Kent). [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 11:41 am
In 2001, the United States Supreme Court held in Palazzolo v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 7:45 am
Innovation Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 4:21 am
According to Section 45, a mark is used in commerce "on services when [1] it is used or displayed in the sale or advertising of services and [2] the services are rendered in commerce, or the services are rendered in more than one State or in the United States and a foreign country and the person rendering the services is engaged in commerce in connection with the services. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 5:52 pm
The Commerce Clause to the United States Constitution provides that Congress has the power to regulate interstate commerce. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:15 am
It will mark the first time since the Court’s 1952 ruling in Steele v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:15 am
It will mark the first time since the Court’s 1952 ruling in Steele v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 4:15 am
Since first filing their United States trademark opposition suit in 2015, Monster has continued their court battle against the Raptors for the last four years with no known resolution to date. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 4:11 pm
Sources: United States Patent and Trademark Office United States Patent and Trademark Office-Trademarks Home California Secretary of State-Trademarks and Service Marks Model State Trademark Law/CA. [read post]