Search for: "United States v. Perry"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,009
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2015, 8:02 am
Zivotofsky v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
United States Office of Personnel Management (No. 10-00257). [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
United States, a case that presents questions about the relationship between religious speech and political speech for purposes of tax exemptions. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 4:10 am
The complaint (full text) in Staley v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 8:21 am
The classic example was Naim v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 1:27 am
And as I suspected he might do, Professor Tribe spent a moment talking about PERRY v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 10:13 am
” Assistant to the Solicitor General Curtis Gannon argued on behalf of the United States as an amicus supporting First Derivative. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:45 pm
Perhaps there is other language from the legislative history which also supports a prospective reading of section 4.Finally, we have Perry v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 7:07 am
Perry, that a Ten Commandments monument on the Texas statehouse grounds was not. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 6:12 pm
Twenty-five years ago, Texas carried outthe first execution by lethal injection in the United States. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 11:40 am
Perry and United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 1:31 pm
So, the United States moved the case to federal court. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 12:33 pm
In Perry v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:27 pm
United States, 570 U. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
The Ruling in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
Perry Equipment Corp. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 5:32 am
In Fix v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
