Search for: "STATE v. SMITH"
Results 3981 - 4000
of 10,048
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2012, 8:29 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 4:52 am
Plaintiff’s attempt to relitigate this issue is unavailing and the conclusory allegations do not adequately state a claim for malpractice (see Garr Silpe, P.C. v Gorman, 192 AD3d 633 [1st Dept 2021]; Olsen v Smith, 187 AD3d 675, 675 [1st Dept 2020]; Sitomer v Goldweber Epstein, LLP, 139 AD3d 642, 643 [1st Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 908 [2016]).THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER” [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 11:31 am
Smith, 19 N.J. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:45 am
That’s the question confronting the New York Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court, in Pappas v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 7:12 am
This right "'must be scrupulously protected'"(People v Smith , 87 NY2d 715, 721 [1996], quoting People v Corrigan , 80 NY2d 326, 332 [1992]). [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:39 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 7:07 am
The psychiatrist stated that SR “doesn’t know how to cook beyond ready meals. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 7:43 am
Graham Smith asked “Who will sort out the Delfi mess? [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 7:55 am
The Court also spent significant time trying to figure out if Himmelreich’s Section 2680 argument runs contrary to the result in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 2:04 am
Smith [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 10:20 am
In Washington v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 5:47 am
Cole, the challenge to a Texas law regulating abortion clinics there, with contributions from Michael Dorf and Mailee Smith. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
As Locke v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 5:35 am
State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 4:22 am
State v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 9:31 am
Hologic, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 8:00 am
Circuit sitting en banc in 1979 on the political question issue in Goldwater v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 5:46 am
United States, currently before the Supreme Court.In the rare cases where the Supreme Court has recognized exceptions to Article III’s criminal trial protections, it has typically invoked functional and normative justifications. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
