Search for: "Strong v. United States"
Results 3981 - 4000
of 6,639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2011, 5:20 am
In doing so, Judge Holwell, by his own account, joined other courts in "rejecting the argument that a domestic transaction occurs whenever the purchaser or seller resides in the United States. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 2:29 pm
The United States has a long tradition of protection for reader privacy. [read post]
20 May 2012, 5:23 pm
This post will discuss a case in which hourly steel makers in Gary, IN allege that United States Steel Corporation is unlawfully refusing to pay them for the time spent putting on and taking off their clothes ("clothes changing time") and time spent walking from the locker room to their work stations and back ("travel time") The collective bargaining agreement between U.S. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:09 am
The nature of the facts varies enormously in the hundreds of ClassicStar cases pending across the United States from cases in which the horse leasing taxpayers had very strong facts, and would likely win at trial, to cases such as Van Wickler. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 6:55 am
Arguing for the United States as an amicus supporting Nassar, Melissa Arbus Sherry was immediately confronted by Justice Kennedy’s practical concerns. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 5:58 pm
The new case is Gross v. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 3:23 pm
" For the reasons set forth below, plaintiff's motion is denied, subject to any further consideration by the United States District Judge to whom this case is randomly assigned…. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 2:54 am
Wal-Mart v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 8:27 am
John Dudas and the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:58 am
NY has an internet fraud unit, and Florida has a cybercrime subunit. [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 1:06 pm
Benefits of being an AGOA-approved country include certain trade preferences, including duty-free export of some goods into the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:44 pm
(Rees v United Kingdom, para 49; Sheffield and Horsham v United Kingdom, para 66; see also Cossey v United Kingdom, paras 43, 46; I v United Kingdom (GC), para 78; Jaremowicz v Poland, para 48 ('right of a man and a woman to marry')) The historical analysis of the original intent behind Article 12 doesn't help. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 6:04 am
Central Regional Employees Benefit Fund v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 9:38 am
State v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:56 am
Justice Alito remarked that "most ordinary homeowners would say this kind of thing can't happen in the United States. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 11:07 am
First and foremost is the Oracle v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
There, he condemned race-based affirmative action in strong language. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 6:23 am
Apple and Epic Games v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 4:30 am
DorfMuch of yesterday's oral argument in Biden v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 5:01 am
[T]he United States and Connecticut constitutions provide historically strong legislation protecting the individual's right to freedom of religion, and prevents the government from either advancing or inhibiting religion…. [read post]
