Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc."
Results 3981 - 4000
of 7,906
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2013, 6:12 am
§360c(i)(E)(i), which gave the FDA express authority to order off-label warnings for substantially equivalent (§510k) medical devices:[T]he director of the organizational unit responsible for regulating devices . [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:53 am
The court doesn’t discuss Bretford Mfg. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 12:19 pm
Chicago, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 7:21 am
Late last year, however, the Federal Circuit in Forest Group Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm
” FDA cites both United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 8:39 am
United Int’l Investigative Servs., Inc., 1993 WL 345186 (N.D. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 5:47 pm
” “In the United States there was not, after the beginning of the last quarter of the century, any opportunity whatever for individual enterprise in any important field of industry, unless backed by great capital. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm
Any arbitration shall be conducted in Harris County, Texas, United States of America in the English language. [read post]
13 May 2018, 9:12 am
Service Employees International Union Local 32BJ v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 3:36 am
Jive Software, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 8:23 am
Rascal House, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 8:25 am
United States) and the power of a bankruptcy trustee to avoid a debtor’s tax payment to the United States (United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 6:41 am
Frank-Erich Hufnagel argued that any concerns in Germany over the United States (as a jurisdiction) violating international law through the grant of antisuit injunctions would have to be addressed at the diplomatic level, with the Federal Republic of Germany, represented by its government, holding talks with the United States. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:17 am
Recently, however, it appears the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, in Disher v. [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 8:33 am
United States, No. 23-402) didn't consider the Appointments Clause at all, so it would not be a good vehicle for a grant of certiorari. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:22 pm
Zyprexa wasn't a fraud on the FDA case. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 10:34 pm
It's thus fun to see the two of them have at it, as they did in the majority and dissent in the recent criminal case of United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 1:06 pm
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Wyeth v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 9:06 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:46 am
Handicap Accessibility, Inc. v. [read post]
