Search for: "United States v. Minor" Results 3981 - 4000 of 7,098
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am by Christa Culver
§ 1983 for interrogating a minor using solely verbal techniques that did not involve any threats.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition (Crowe)Brief in opposition (Houser)Consolidated reply to brief in opposition (McDonough) Title: Blum v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Association of Private Sector Colleges and Universities v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
There is of course no general exception for speech to minors, including speech that depicts violence. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 9:26 am by Michael Lowe
Use of Minors in the Prostitution Enterprise According to DPS, the main concern of both state and local law enforcement agencies is the use of minors in prostitution enterprises. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:15 pm by Sri Medicherla
The legislation restricts wetlands that the state can regulate to those considered “waters of the United States,” and it specifies that wetlands do not include prior converted cropland. [read post]
4 May 2007, 11:43 am
United States, 503 U.S. 540 (U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Department or Homeland Security issued a “National Terrorism Advisory System (NTAS) Bulletin,” warning of, “a heightened threat environment across the United States,” and, “violent riots have continued in recent days,” and, “ideologically-motivated actors” could incite further violence. [read post]
30 May 2018, 9:19 am by John Elwood
Garza, 17-654 Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 8:52 am
The Court has already emphasised, drawing on the provisions of Article 40 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child of 1989, the special position of minors in the criminal-justice sphere and has noted in particular the need for the protection of their privacy at criminal trials (see T. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24724/94, § § 75 and 85, 16 December 1999). [read post]
23 May 2021, 8:37 am
China made its sanctions move after the EU, Britain, Canada and the United States launched coordinated sanctions against officials in China over human rights abuses in the far western Xinjiang region. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 1:33 pm by Josh Blackman
Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (Cslif.) criticized the case as a waste of “time and taxpayer dollars. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am by John Ehrett
Lane; and (2) whether the United States Supreme Court has jurisdiction over a state court determination of retroactivity of a case on collateral review, when a state has both adopted and applied Teague. [read post]