Search for: "C. v. C."
Results 4001 - 4020
of 56,542
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2013, 3:27 pm
This is clear from the quote in Ash v. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 4:28 am
Filed February 21, 2007--Opinion by Judge Catherine C. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:54 pm
Swirsky, Adam C. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 2:30 am
This appeal considers whether employees in Asda’s retail operations are entitled to compare themselves with employees in the distribution centres so that they can rely on section 79(4)(c) of the Equality Act 2010 or, as regards the period covered by the Equal Pay Act 1970, so that they are in the “same employment” as defined in section 1(6) of the 1970 Act. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
On Wednesday 20 February, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council will hear the appeal of C v C (Jersey). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:16 am
STATE V. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 1:49 am
§ 1182(c) (1994); and (2) The decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Abebe v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 2:35 pm
” Microsoft Corp. v. i4i L. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 4:52 pm
A Long Island Criminal Lawyer said this focus was made manifest by the Court of Appeals in Matter of Balcerak v County of Nassau, which concerned an injury to a Nassau County correction officer. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 5:32 pm
Sierra Forest Legacy v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 3:32 pm
On June 17, 2013 the Supreme Court announced its decision in Alleyne v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 3:32 pm
On June 17, 2013 the Supreme Court announced its decision in Alleyne v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 1:00 am
In the matter of C (Children), heard 9-10 Oct 2017. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 2:30 am
Relying on KA v Belgium (Case C-82/16) [2018] 3 CMLR 28, the Court held that children and adults are treated separately and a TCN will only have a derivative right of residence by reference to a dependant relationship with an adult EU citizen in exceptional circumstances. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm
Paris v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 12:35 am
Likewise, Shopify’s appeal in SHOPPI (Shopify v EUIPO, C-751/22 P, see here and here) would be unsuccessful, as the GC in the decision contested there stuck with the case law setting all the emphasis on the time of the BoA decision. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:05 pm
Does, C-11-02533 (DMR) (N.D. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 9:02 am
§ 154(b), provides for the restoration of patent term in three circumstances: (i) an “A-Delay,” which awards PTA for delays arising from the USPTO’s failure to act by certain examination deadlines; (ii) a “B-Delay,” which awards PTA for an application pendency exceeding three years; and (iii) a “C-Delay,” which awards PTA for delays due to interferences, secrecy orders, and appeals. [read post]
18 May 2012, 7:13 am
C-12-518 EDL (N.D. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 8:24 am
Law Lessons from PATRICK C. [read post]
