Search for: "YOUNG v. STATE"
Results 4001 - 4020
of 8,042
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2023, 7:55 am
In the case of Kudrocova v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 1:19 pm
The Court stated as follows: [25] The law to be applied in determining the duty of a driver when there are children in or about the area was set out by Hood J. in Bourne (Guardian ad litem of) v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 6:26 am
Tuesday’s arguments in the GPS surveillance case United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 7:10 am
U.S. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 7:51 am
In today's case, Murray v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 4:06 pm
And indeed, in this context (unlike that of a crucial eyewitness) the state can protect itself to a great degree by ensuring (as is standard practice in at least some jurisdictions) that at least two people competent to testify about what happened in the autopsy are present (and preferably one of them rather young!). [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 12:38 pm
” Citing McIntyre v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:49 am
Similarly, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg emphasized that the United States has a treaty obligation under Article V to defend its allies in Europe from foreign aggression, noting that Article V has only been invoked following the 9/11 attacks. [read post]
30 May 2017, 4:06 pm
And indeed, in this context (unlike that of a crucial eyewitness) the state can protect itself to a great degree by ensuring (as is standard practice in at least some jurisdictions) that at least two people competent to testify about what happened in the autopsy are present (and preferably one of them rather young!). [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 3:00 pm
By contrast, both OHIM bodies and GC have a duty to conduct a full review of the national law particulars submitted by parties, obtaining information about the national law of the Member State concerned on their own motion for the purposes of assessing the accuracy of the facts adduced or the probative value of the documents submitted [Edwin v OHIM, Case C‑263/09 P], as the GC did by looking through Italian law and case law on probative value of the 1986… [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:38 am
On February 12, 2015, the Florida Supreme Court quashed the Fourth District Court of Appeal’s decision in Sanders v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:57 pm
v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:17 pm
Articles about the First Amendment, state constitutional free speech provisions, federal and state statutes, common-law rules, and regulations protecting or restricting speech, or private organizations' speech regulations. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 12:01 pm
The Supreme Judicial Court recently issued a decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 1:47 pm
Another First Amendment issues affecting school students across the United States concerns bracelets stating “I ? [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 1:18 pm
Such a maneuver would have reached the Court in the midst of its continuing deliberations on how to decide the case of United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
Can you describe the differences between statutory law systems in the United States and the statutory codes of European states? [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 8:29 am
Young, 13-95, the state-on-top habeas case asking whether (1) a state can forfeit application of the Stone v. [read post]
22 Aug 2015, 7:37 am
Additional Resources: Alcohol-Impaired Driving Among Adults – United States, 2012, Aug. 7, 2015, CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report More Blog Entries: Kimminau v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 8:54 am
In the Courts Australia Massoud v Ors [2021] NSWDC 336, District Court of New South Wales, the plaintiff was suspended and dismissed from his employment as a journalist for telling an 18 year old cadet that if he weren’t so young, the plaintiff would “rip his head off and shit down his throat. [read post]
