Search for: "Wells v. Wells"
Results 4021 - 4040
of 96,998
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2013, 8:43 am
Instead, the EAT went on to hold, a Tribunal should focus its attention on the established principles set by case law (in particular Metropolitan Resources v Churchill Dulwich and summarised in Enterprise Management Services v Connect-Up Ltd) to determine whether employees should have transferred under TUPE. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 2:52 am
” The De Well Case A prime example of the perils of the client-negotiated buy-out agreement is found in De Well Container Shipping Corp. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 2:57 am
Here is the abstract:The Supreme Court's decision in Morse v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 2:02 pm
Here’s the early word on the Supreme Court’s ruling in Kennedy v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:08 pm
There was extensive coverage of, and a variety of reactions to, the Court’s decision today in Brown v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
Moor v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 10:29 pm
Z (A child) [2012] EWHC 139 (Fam) is, to my knowledge, the first reported relocation case since MK v CK [2011] EWCA Civ 793.To briefly recap, in MK v CK it was made clear that the only principle to be drawn from Payne v Payne [2001] 1 FLR 1052 - which had skewed relocation decisions for ten years - was the paramountcy principle - everything else was guidance.Returning to Z (A child) :The facts: This case comes with a lot of 'baggage', primarily related to the… [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 8:55 am
Alan Ehrlich will be presenting Ramifications of Stanford v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 4:23 pm
In TELUS Corporation v. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 8:24 am
The Supreme Judicial Court’s (“SJC”) ruling in Verdrager v. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 8:24 am
The Supreme Judicial Court’s (“SJC”) ruling in Verdrager v. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 8:24 am
The Supreme Judicial Court’s (“SJC”) ruling in Verdrager v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 10:45 am
Can’t Live Without It, LLC v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 8:10 am
Category: FYI Body: Law of the Case: "This court follows the 'well-recognized principle of law that the opinion of an appellate court, so far as it is applicable, establishes the law of the case upon a retrial, and is equally obligatory upon the parties to the action and upon the trial court.'" Dacey v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 8:19 am
Corp. v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 11:40 am
State v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:12 pm
Kasten v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 2:01 pm
That worked for a long while, but several previously successful lawyers ultimately lost their law licenses as a result.Another well-known strategy is to do the same thing with serial lawsuits under the Americans with Disabilities Act. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:12 am
Oh well. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 1:17 pm
(As well as not at all sophisticated about what the police officers were doing to him.) [read post]
