Search for: "Marks v. State"
Results 4041 - 4060
of 19,308
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 7:25 am
First, in Lucia Marett v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 5:03 am
Title Agency, LLC, 545 F.3d 241, 247 (3d Cir. 2008) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 12:47 pm
’State v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:33 pm
California Emergency Physicians Medical Group; Med America; Mark Alderdice; Robert Buscho, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (No. 12-16514) (April 8, 2015). [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Cecilia Sbrolli re-imagines the decision in the case Fuller v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 4:55 am
Finally Matt addressed industrial applicability, there being a new case to cite in Eli Lilly v Human Genome Sciences Inc, as well as a string of perpetual motion machines. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:18 am
Agency v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:56 am
Finally, it chides both sets of attorneys for failing to cite the United States Supreme Court case of DASTAR CORP. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:13 am
EU General Court explains how the relevant assessment is to be undertaken | High Court employs ‘intention to target’ approach to determine application of EU/UK law in online trade mark infringement case | There's a new IPO report on designs infringement - game-changer or stating the obvious? [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 9:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:55 am
” Palm Bay Imps., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:55 pm
Unifund,[5] and the same is true of other states. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 9:52 am
June 24,2015) (quotation marks omitted). [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 9:56 am
State Farm Ins. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:43 pm
The Sixth Circuit further stated that the 2006 Act is designed to protect trademarks from any unfavorable sexual associations, and any new mark with a lewd or offensive-to-some sexual association raises a strong inference of tarnishment. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am
The first was Hughes v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 7:23 am
In 1993, Horphag was granted the United States trademark for the mark Pycnogenol. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 6:58 am
Supreme Court in 1994, in Campbell v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 3:30 am
In Barker v. [read post]
