Search for: "People v Washington" Results 4041 - 4060 of 6,679
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2023, 10:31 am by John Elwood
Enough people think this case may have legs that a whopping fourteen amicus briefs were filed supporting the petition. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by John Elwood
Washington prejudice flowing from his counsel’s brief absence during the taking of evidence that did not inculpate his client. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 9:02 am
In the past two days the Washington Post and New York Times have run several dispiriting articles about Israel's war against Hamas. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
Some people are getting this priceless protection, and others are not, with little justification for the different treatment but just because they drew a judge who is more open to pseudonymity or because the judge found their plight to be specially sympathetic. [1] See Hundtofte v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 12:44 pm by Susan Hennessey, Helen Klein Murillo
Whether Trump’s comments represent an intentional deflection or merely reflect misaligmed priorities, most people can agree without defending leaking that the leaks are probably not the “real scandal” here. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 1:57 pm by Amy Howe
Fittingly, the case on their docket that day is one of the biggest of the year: Trump v. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 8:16 am
And, as is usual in these matters, it is not the officials but rather people (individuals and communities) who are left to pay the bill. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:16 am by Connor Clerkin, Lane Corrigan
Under the Constitution, according to Gorsuch, judges cannot “improvise with their own election rules in place of those the people’s representatives have adopted. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Malta The Prime Minister’s former chief of staff, Keith Schembri, has dropped two libel suits instituted against Daphne Caruana Galizia over allegations that he had received large sums of money from people close to Azerbaijani politicians. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
[Professor Shugerman's argument that the 1793 Hamilton Document, that is, a list of "every person holding any civil office or employment under the United States, (except the judges)," was intended to ensure compliance with the Constitution's Sinecure Clause lacks support.] [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 4:19 pm by The Law Blogger
 Pilot face recognition programs are rolling-out in New York, Washington D.C. and Orlando.Across the board, law enforcement officials issue assurances that the facial recognition software they are considering will not be used to monitor random citizens, immigrants, activists or people of color. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 4:45 am by Jon Hyman
Here’s the rest of what I read this week: Discrimination Discrimination v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 2:42 pm by Sophia Cope
First Amendment Protects Facebook’s Editorial Decisions In Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 10:04 am by Jordan Brunner
  Luca Marzorati previewed the argument in John Doe v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 4:45 am by Jon Hyman
People who are inclined to say it think it instead. [read post]