Search for: "Doctor v. State" Results 4081 - 4100 of 8,646
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2009, 11:34 pm
But, while the word ‘shall' is often mandatory, particularly when used in legislation, it has, depending on the context, been interpreted on occasion as directory or exhortatory only: see for example R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Jeyeanthan [2000] 1 WLR 354. [read post]
1 May 2017, 12:18 pm
The trial court denied Tanubagijo's new trial motion and sentenced him to 25 years to life in state prison.People v. [read post]
31 May 2015, 3:47 am
It would have been better if doctors had been provided with a defence, or the restriction on methods of treatment repealed altogether. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 9:14 am by Will
Last year, we had Schering-Plough Corp. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 8:38 am
While the letter is the second by the House Republican leaders asking the Governor to join Kentucky as they appeal the case of Baze v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 1:55 pm by Maxine Neuhauser
In a brief  opinion, the Court substantially adopted the Appellate Division’s reasoning in Wild v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by zshapiro
The Supreme Court granted cert in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:50 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Kitzhaber, MD, Governor of the State of Oregon, hereby grant Gary D. [read post]