Search for: "People v Childs"
Results 4081 - 4100
of 6,945
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2014, 10:36 am
AF v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 6:35 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am
Consultation on mandatory reporting of child sexual abuse: a reminder The Home Office consultation on Mandatory reporting of child sexual abuse is still open for responses: it closes on 14 August. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:21 am
Supreme Court in Nestlé v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 6:52 am
Even as a child, I was curious about how people try to persuade others. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 3:18 pm
You are quite wrong about the law in Texas, (which is why the only people making mandatory reporter arguments in this context are social workers and child advocates rather than lawyers) and you do the public a terrible disservice by spreading misinformation.What is your basis for making the allegation that the Texas statute makes this individual a mandatory reporter? [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 6:49 am
Baby Girl (parental rights under the Indian Child Welfare Act); AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 9:57 am
” People v. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 5:03 am
In a post at Slate, my buddy Cristian Farias writes about Chief Justice John Roberts’ cute quip during oral argument in Rodriquez v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:04 am
Id. at 31.Mulford further limits the holding of Pierce v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 6:41 am
Valencia; The People v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 9:32 am
” Hilton v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:26 am
However, the people seem to be okay with 2 of the Court's 3 categorical exclusions:Mentally retarded (Atkins): 18.7 / 79.6 / 1.7Under 18 (Simmons): 41.6 / 56.6 / 1.6Rape of a child (Kennedy): 67.3 / 31.5 / 1.2Boumediene v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
Sources: United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:26 pm
These people they get to watch the tax cuts from the Bush years expire. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 9:26 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:57 am
Still, many people do not buckle up. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 9:21 am
Doe v. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 7:17 am
Third, the Kentucky decisions thus far have their blinders on by simply analyzing it as the dealings with mom and non-biological dad such that the presumption exists until rebutted, and if there is a paternity action by the mom against the non-biological dad or during the divorce then the resultant decree constitutes res judicata on these two people as to the parentage. [read post]
19 Aug 2017, 12:00 am
Many people would argue that in divorce cases where child support or spousal support is ordered, it is smart to have a life insurance policy in place on the parent who is obligated to pay. [read post]
