Search for: "People v. House" Results 4081 - 4100 of 11,169
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  If yes, the law is little changed as a practical matter, and the same people will be convicted, by and large. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 6:59 am
  The judge then began his analysis of Vafeades’ motion to suppress, explaining that theFourth Amendment ensures `[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures’ and that `no [w]arrants shall issue but upon probable cause . . . and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:39 am
’ This is a reference to the house where defendant bought Moose.Defendant ratcheted up the rhetoric in his next two posts. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
There are no new PCC adjudications this week, but four new resolved PCC cases: Mr Johnny Dean v NME NME, Clause 3, 25/01/2013; Mr Ian Calland v Golf Monthly, Clause 1, 24/01/2013; Mr Martin Jones v Reading Post, Clause 1, 24/01/2013 and Dame Tessa Jowell v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 24/01/2013. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 7:22 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Was Allergan’s patent-housing agreement in exchange for sovereign immunity a “sham to subvert the existing intellectual property system”? [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 4:21 pm by jesse londin
And here is House Science and Technology Committee chairman Bart Gordon's (D-TN) reaction to the "mix of good news and not-so-good news. [read post]