Search for: "People v. Price"
Results 4081 - 4100
of 4,344
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2023, 12:18 pm
Here you are thinking you’re helping because a physical ticket mailed out to people could be lost, burned, copied, etc. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:36 am
Had different instincts about copyrightable works created as logos v. use of Snoopy, created for other purposes, then transferred into TM by licensing. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:56 am
Case law The Spencer v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 11:01 pm
Indeed, Justice Antonin Scalia earlier this year urged the Supreme Court to take up the issue in his dissent from denial of certiorari in Sorich, et al v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
Judge Fallon found more useful authority in Rivera v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 2:50 am
Skyscraper originalism views the Constitution as more or less a finished product (albeit always subject to later Article V amendment). [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:14 am
U.S. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 9:56 pm
Magistrates in the Tang Dynasty in early China were also eager to avoid the formal legal system and so encouraged parties to resolve disputes amicably between themselves.[9] In contrast, the United States’ patent law can be seen in the case of Twentieth Century Music Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 8:02 pm
Background The controversy that the Supreme Court stirred up almost exactly one year ago with its ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:14 am
M.Wilson v North Lanarkshire Council & Others (A1628/01) which has its origins in the mid 1990’s and brought about Scotland’s first civil law McKenzie Friend in late 2009, involves a sole party litigant, Mr Martin Wilson, a former Music lecturer of Motherwell College who, according to media reports was forced out of his job after sustaining severe back injuries during the course of his duties as a music lecturer during his time at the College in the 1990’s. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 12:54 pm
New York State Restaurant Assoc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 10:10 am
v=%CE%B1&r=04833355782549953; R. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 7:46 am
Even these trials – which often tend to reduce costs overall, and are usually short hearings in themselves – may routinely give rise to costs of £25,000 per side (Price v MGN [2019] 1 WLR 1464). [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 6:57 am
At least that’s what a Magistrate Judge in the District of New Jersey decided last week in Harish v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
Also in the US, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that watchmaker Omega's attempt to use copyright laws to block the sale of Omega watches at discounted prices by Costco will just not work - because of the 'first sale' doctrine' - and that Omega's action was also a misuse of copyright. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 8:47 am
One reason that it cost so little is that it is working for purpose–it is not intended to catch everything, it is only intended to catch works by the people who sign YouTube’s chump deal or people who are “important” (in the best traditions of YouTube’s founders). [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:33 am
The criminal gang responsible for this theft sold the Buddha heads to a dealer from Chengdu at $1500, and they then sold them to a buyer from Southeast China for $18,500.[16] It often happens that the stolen work doubles or triples in price each time it is transferred to a new buyer. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
Jay also founded Prefix, LLC, which helps lawyers and clients value and price legal services. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
”[15] Material interference may be proven through several methods, such as: (i) inference from an entity’s intent to interfere, (ii) evidence that the “natural consequence” of the act or omission is interference, or (iii) evidence that the act or omission in fact interfered with a consumer’s understanding.[16] Furthermore, “it may be reasonable to presume” material interference if certain “consequential” transaction terms, such as… [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 4:44 am
“Many people are talking about it. [read post]
