Search for: "United States v. House"
Results 4081 - 4100
of 11,990
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am
Professor Seck has recently been considering ramifications of Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum 569 U. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:15 am
The United States Department of Agriculture has the important obligation to protect American farms, orchards, forests, parks and backyards against the damage that can be caused by plant diseases and pests that enter the United States through our ports of entry. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 1:33 pm
A patentee can sue in federal court housed in the state where the defendant is incorporated. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 11:54 am
United States and California (Civil Action No. 4:18-cv-00167) (previous HL Pulse discussion here). [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 5:31 am
The Ninth Circuit, however, has now reversed on the central issue in United States Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 10:48 am
I Dig Texas, LLC v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 11:24 pm
Also, there's an obscure Thales v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.I'm back to the Second Amendment because of this comment, because I find my own views on the Second Amendment so at odds with how I see the world, and because, frankly, I haven't figured out just what I want to say about Judge Bolton's order in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:10 am
United Kingdom (E. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 2:05 pm
As we've told you, currently the bailout bill, now passed by the Senate, and looking better in the House, provides: "Actions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act shall be subject to chapter 7 of title 5, United States Code [that's the Administrative Procedure Act], including that such actions shall be held unlawful and set aside if found to be arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or not in accordance with law. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:30 pm
Constitution of the United States The Court indicated that the assessment is not really a "penalty. [read post]
27 May 2007, 8:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 4:37 am
At Talking Points Memo, Sahil Kapur examines the extent to which the lower courts have relied on last year’s decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 4:39 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:45 am
And he was Chief Executive of one the largest publicly quoted companies in the United Kingdom, doing business on a global scale. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 7:17 am
The style of the case is Sanders v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 11:44 am
Supreme Court Justice who authored the opinion in Winans v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 4:25 am
According to a recent news article from Syracuse.com, a man was recently sentenced to prison for alleging defrauding the United States Social Security Administration (SSA) out of more than $87,000. [read post]
