Search for: "Doctor v. State"
Results 4101 - 4120
of 8,646
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2010, 6:30 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice Court Erred in Applying 18-Level Enhancement in Re-Entry Case United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 12:03 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEmployment NYU Denied Judgment on Liability on Retaliatory Discharge Claim; Issues Exist on Doctor's Back Pay Pay Pal v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:42 am
U.S. (10-7387) — federal judge’s power to set federal sentence to run consecutively to future state sentence Federal Aviation Administration v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 8:52 am
In Cameron v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:31 pm
Ongoing litigation in United States ex rel. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 9:11 am
Additional Resources: P.W. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 3:20 pm
Related Posts: Armstrong v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 5:38 pm
Lapine v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 11:43 am
Some states (Michigan, Minnesota, Kentucky, and others) have adopted a system that allows doctors to disclose medical errors and then enter into mediation to resolve the dispute. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 4:48 am
The recent opinion in Fitzpatrick v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 11:55 am
Supreme Court in Sorrell v. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 9:56 am
The second, Moyle v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 5:09 am
Robert Frederick, a doctor at Nazareth, to stop doing business with it. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:27 am
W (by her litigation friend, B) v M (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) and others [2011] EWHC 2443 (Fam). [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 5:45 am
Esperanza Andrade, in her official capacity as Secretary of State for the State of Texas v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 10:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
Estate of Anthony Imparato, Sr. v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 8:00 am
Martin v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 1:37 pm
Here's the money quote from the Court of Appeal that states its holding on this issue: "The conclusions of the therapists on the JCST panel that they would be compelled to reveal any disclosures made by petitioner are therefore incorrect. [read post]
